Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2013 May 2:8:108.
doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-8-108.

Elective lymph node irradiation late course accelerated hyper-fractionated radiotherapy plus concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase II study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Elective lymph node irradiation late course accelerated hyper-fractionated radiotherapy plus concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase II study

Dongqing Wang et al. Radiat Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: In this phase II study, we evaluated the efficacy, toxicity, and patterns of failure of elective lymph node irradiation (ENI) late course accelerated hyper-fractionated radiotherapy (LCAHRT) concurrently with cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CHT) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

Methods: Patients with clinical stage II-IVa (T1-4N0-1M0 or M1a) ESCC were enrolled between 2004 and 2011. Radiation therapy (RT) comprised two courses: The first course of radiation covered the primary and metastatic regional tumors and high risk lymph nodal regions, given at 2 Gy per fraction for a dose of 40 Gy. In the second course, LCAHRT was delivered to the boost volume twice a day for an additional 19.6 Gy in 7 treatment days, using 1.4 Gy per fraction. Two cycles of CHT were given at the beginning of RT.

Results: The median age and Karnofsky performance status were 63 years and 80, respectively. The American Joint Committee on Cancer stage was II in 14 (20.6%) patients, III in 32 (47.1%), and IVa in 22 (32.3%). With a median follow-up of 18.5 months, the overall survival at 1-, 3-, 5-year were 75.5%, 46.5%, 22.7% for whole group patients, versus 78.6%, 49.4%, 39.9% for patients with stage II-III. The patterns of first failure from local recurrence, regional failure, and distant metastasis were seen in 20.6%, 17.6%, and 19.1%, respectively. The most frequent acute high-grade (≥ 3) toxicities were esophagitis and leucopenia, occurred in 26.4% and 32.4%.

Conclusions: ENI LCAHRT concurrently with CHT was appeared to be an effective regimen for ESCC patient with a favorable and tolerated profile. Further observation with longer time and randomized phase III trial is currently underway.

Trial registration: ChiCTR-TRC-09000568.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
TNM stage distribution in 68 patients. The American Joint Committee TNM stage was II in 14 (20.6%) patients, III in 32 (47.1%), and IVa in 22 (32.3%), respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meier curve of overall survival (OS) for whole group patients treated with late course accelerated hyper-fractionated radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 18.5 months, the median survival was 34.4 months (95% confidence interval: 19.1–49.6 months), and the 1-, 3-, 5-year OS were 75.5%, 46.5%, 22.7%, respectively.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival (OS) were compared in patients with TNM stage II-III and IVa. For patients with stage II–III, the 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 78.6%, 49.4%, and 39.9%, respectively, versus 68.3%, 41.0%, and 15.4% for IVa patients, respectively, however, no statistically significant difference was observed in our limited sample size (p=0.671).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan-Meier curves of overall survival (OS) were compared in patients receiving different chemotherapy regimens. Our data did not show statistically significant difference in OS rates between the three groups (p=0.690).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cooper JS, Guo MD, Herskovic A. Chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal cancer: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial (RTOG 85–01). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. JAMA. 1999;281:1623–1627. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.17.1623. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Minsky BD, Pajak TF, Ginsberg RJ. INT 0123 (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 94–05) phase III trial of combined-modality therapy for esophageal cancer: high-dose versus standard-dose radiation therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:1167–1174. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.5.1167. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fowler JF, Lindstrom MJ. Loss of local control with prolongation in radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1992;23:457–467. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(92)90768-D. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Withers HR, Taylor JM, Maciejewski B. The hazard of accelerated tumor clonogen repopulation during radiotherapy. Acta Oncol. 1988;27:131–146. doi: 10.3109/02841868809090333. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhang YW, Chen L, Bai Y. Long-term outcomes of late course accelerated hyper-fractionated radiotherapy for localized esophageal carcinoma in Mainland China: a meta-analysis. Dis Esophagus. 2011;24:495–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2010.01173.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms