Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;28(5):898-910.
doi: 10.1093/her/cyt058. Epub 2013 May 2.

Impact of point-of-sale tobacco display bans: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey

Affiliations

Impact of point-of-sale tobacco display bans: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey

Lin Li et al. Health Educ Res. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

This study examined the impact of point-of-sale (POS) tobacco marketing restrictions in Australia and Canada, in relation to the United Kingdom and the United States where there were no such restrictions during the study period (2006-10). The data came from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey, a prospective multi-country cohort survey of adult smokers. In jurisdictions where POS display bans were implemented, smokers' reported exposure to tobacco marketing declined markedly. From 2006 to 2010, in Canada, the percentages noticing POS tobacco displays declined from 74.1 to 6.1% [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.26, P < 0.001]; and reported exposure to POS tobacco advertising decreased from 40.3 to 14.1% (adjusted OR = 0.61, P < 0.001). Similarly, in Australia, noticing of POS displays decreased from 73.9 to 42.9%. In contrast, exposure to POS marketing in the United States and United Kingdom remained high during this period. In parallel, there were declines in reported exposures to other forms of advertising/promotion in Canada and Australia, but again, not in the United States or United Kingdom. Impulse purchasing of cigarettes was lower in places that enacted POS display bans. These findings indicate that implementing POS tobacco display bans does result in lower exposure to tobacco marketing and less frequent impulse purchasing of cigarettes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Noticing POS tobacco displays over time.

References

    1. Carter OBJ, Mills BW, Donovan RJ. The effect of retail cigarette pack displays on unplanned purchases: results from immediate post-purchase interviews. Tob Control. 2009;18:218–21. - PubMed
    1. Paynter J, Edwards R, Schluter P, et al. Point of sale tobacco displays and smoking among 14–15 years olds in New Zealand: a cross-sectional study. Tob Control. 2009;18:268–74. - PubMed
    1. Wakefield M, Germain D, Durkin S, et al. An experimental study of effects on schoolchildren of exposure to point-of-sale cigarette advertising and pack displays. Health Educ Res. 2006;21:338–47. - PubMed
    1. Henriksen L, Flora J, Feighery E, et al. Effects on youth of exposure to retail tobacco advertising. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2002;32:1771–89.
    1. Wakefield M, Germain D, Henriksen L. The effect of retail cigarette pack displays on impulse purchase. Addiciton. 2008;103:322–8. - PubMed

Publication types