Graduate Socialization in the Responsible Conduct of Research: A National Survey on the Research Ethics Training Experiences of Psychology Doctoral Students
- PMID: 23641128
- PMCID: PMC3639435
- DOI: 10.1080/10508420903275283
Graduate Socialization in the Responsible Conduct of Research: A National Survey on the Research Ethics Training Experiences of Psychology Doctoral Students
Abstract
Little is known about the mechanisms by which psychology graduate programs transmit responsible conduct of research (RCR) values. A national sample of 968 current students and recent graduates of mission-diverse doctoral psychology programs, completed a web-based survey on their research ethics challenges, perceptions of RCR mentoring and department climate, their ability to conduct research responsibility, and whether they believed psychology as a discipline promotes scientific integrity. Research experience, mentor RCR instruction and modeling, and department RCR policies predicted student RCR preparedness. Mentor RCR instruction, department RCR policies, and faculty modeling of RCR behaviors predicted confidence in the RCR integrity of the discipline. Implications for training are discussed.
Keywords: Climate; Department; Ethics; Graduate Education; Mentoring; Psychology; Research; Responsible Conduct of Research.
References
-
- American Psychological Association. Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. American Psychologist. 2002;57:1060–1073. - PubMed
-
- American Psychological Association Center for Psychology Workforce Analysis and Research. 2008 Graduate Study in Psychology. 2008 Retrieved September 25, 2008 from http://research.apa.org/doctoraled16.html.
-
- American Psychological Association, Ethics Committee. Report of the Ethics Committee, 2003. American Psychologist. 2004;59(5):434–441.
-
- American Psychological Association, Ethics Committee. Report of the Ethics Committee, 2004. American Psychologist. 2005;60(5):523–528.
-
- American Psychological Association, Ethics Committee. Report of the Ethics Committee, 2005. American Psychologist. 2006;61(5):522–529. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources