Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems
- PMID: 23641661
Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems
Abstract
The digital intraoral impression is a central part in today's CAD/CAM dentistry. With its possibilities, new treatment options for the patient is provided and the prosthetic workflow is accelerated. Nowadays, the major issue with intraoral scanning systems is to gain more accuracy especially for larger scan areas and to simplify clinical handling for the dentist. The aim of this study was to investigate different scanning strategies regardingtheir accuracy with full arch scans in an in-vitro study design. A reference master model was used for the digital impressions with the Lava COS, the Cerec Bluecam and a powderfree intraoral scanning system, Cadent iTero. The trueness and precision of each scanning protocol was measured. Lava COS provides the a trueness of 45.8 microm with the scanning protocol recommended from the manufacturer. A different scanning protocol shows significantly lower accuracy (trueness +/- 90.2 microm). Cerec Bluecam also benefits from an optimal scanning protocol with a trueness of +/- 23.3 microm compared to +/- 52.5 microm with a standard protocol. The powderfree impression system Cadent iTero shows also a high accurate full-arch scan with a trueness of +/- 35.0 microm and a precision of +/- 30.9 microm. With the current intraoral scanning systems, full arch dental impressions are possible with a high accuracy, if adequate scan strategies are used. The powderfree scanning system provides the same level of accuracy compared to scanning systems with surface pretreatment.
Similar articles
-
Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions--an in-vitro study.Int J Comput Dent. 2011;14(1):11-21. Int J Comput Dent. 2011. PMID: 21657122 English, German.
-
Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Feb;109(2):121-8. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60028-1. J Prosthet Dent. 2013. PMID: 23395338
-
Evaluation of the accuracy of digital impressions with different scanning strategies: An in vitro study.J Dent. 2024 Dec;151:105433. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105433. Epub 2024 Oct 28. J Dent. 2024. PMID: 39490607
-
Optical impression systems for CAD-CAM restorations.J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Nov;23(6):e575-9. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31826b8043. J Craniofac Surg. 2012. PMID: 23172483 Review.
-
In vivo full-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners: a narrative review.Int J Comput Dent. 2022 Mar 24;25(1):9-16. Int J Comput Dent. 2022. PMID: 35322648 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of fit and efficiency of CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic restorations based on direct and indirect digitalization: a double-blinded, randomized clinical trial.Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Mar;20(2):291-300. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1504-6. Epub 2015 Jun 14. Clin Oral Investig. 2016. PMID: 26070435 Clinical Trial.
-
Digital versus Traditional Workflow for Posterior Maxillary Rehabilitations Supported by One Straight and One Tilted Implant: A 3-Year Prospective Comparative Study.Biomed Res Int. 2018 Nov 11;2018:4149107. doi: 10.1155/2018/4149107. eCollection 2018. Biomed Res Int. 2018. PMID: 30534562 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of Digital and Conventional Full-Arch Impressions in Patients: An Update.J Clin Med. 2020 Mar 4;9(3):688. doi: 10.3390/jcm9030688. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 32143433 Free PMC article.
-
In vivo precision of conventional and digital methods for obtaining quadrant dental impressions.Clin Oral Investig. 2016 Sep;20(7):1495-504. doi: 10.1007/s00784-015-1641-y. Epub 2015 Nov 7. Clin Oral Investig. 2016. PMID: 26547869
-
Precision of guided scanning procedures for full-arch digital impressions in vivo.J Orofac Orthop. 2017 Nov;78(6):466-471. doi: 10.1007/s00056-017-0103-3. Epub 2017 Jul 21. J Orofac Orthop. 2017. PMID: 28733810 English.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous