Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial
- PMID: 23643139
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70126-8
Pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre randomised trial
Abstract
Background: Postoperative pancreatic fistula is the leading cause of death and morbidity after pancreaticoduodenectomy. However, the best reconstruction method to reduce occurrence of fistula is debated. We did a multicentre, randomised superiority trial to compare the outcomes of different reconstructive techniques in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours.
Methods: Patients aged 18-85 years with confirmed or suspected neoplasms of the pancreas, distal bile duct, ampulla vateri, duodenum, or periampullary tumours were eligible for inclusion. An internet-based platform was used to randomly assign patients to either pancreaticojejunostomy or pancreaticogastrostomy as reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy, using permuted blocks with six patients per block. Within each centre the randomisation was stratified on the pancreatic duct diameter (≤3 mm vs >3 mm) measured at the time of surgery. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of clinical postoperative pancreatic fistula (grade B or C) as defined by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Fistula. The study was not masked and analyses were done by intention to treat. Patient follow-up was closed 2 months after discharge from the hospital. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00830778.
Findings: Between June, 2009, and August, 2012, we randomly allocated 167 patients to receive pancreaticojejunostomy and 162 to receive pancreaticogastrostomy. 33 (19.8%) patients in the pancreaticojejunostomy group and 13 (8.0%) in the pancreaticogastrostomy group had clinical postoperative pancreatic fistula (OR 2.86, 95% CI 1.38-6.17; p=0.002). The overall incidence of postoperative complications did not differ significantly between the groups (99 in the pancreaticojejunostomy group vs 100 in the pancreaticogastrostomy group), although more events in the pancreaticojejunostomy group were of grade ≥3a than in the pancreaticogastrostomy group (39 vs 35).
Interpretation: In patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head or periampullary tumours, pancreaticogastrostomy is more efficient than pancreaticojejunostomy in reducing the incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula.
Funding: Funding Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices, Belgium.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Pancreaticoduodenectomy: time to change our approach?Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):573-5. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70159-1. Epub 2013 May 2. Lancet Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23643140 No abstract available.
-
Pancreas: Reconstruction methods after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Aug;10(8):445-6. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.114. Epub 2013 Jun 25. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013. PMID: 23797871 No abstract available.
-
[Reconstruction after pancreatoduodenectomy. Pancreatojejunostomy or pancreatogastrostomy?].Chirurg. 2013 Oct;84(10):907. doi: 10.1007/s00104-013-2613-x. Chirurg. 2013. PMID: 24068201 German. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Pancreas: Reconstruction methods after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Aug;10(8):445-6. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.114. Epub 2013 Jun 25. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013. PMID: 23797871 No abstract available.
-
Pancreaticoduodenectomy: time to change our approach?Lancet Oncol. 2013 Jun;14(7):573-5. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70159-1. Epub 2013 May 2. Lancet Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23643140 No abstract available.
-
[Reconstruction after pancreatoduodenectomy. Pancreatojejunostomy or pancreatogastrostomy?].Chirurg. 2013 Oct;84(10):907. doi: 10.1007/s00104-013-2613-x. Chirurg. 2013. PMID: 24068201 German. No abstract available.
-
Meta-analysis of pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy.Br J Surg. 2006 Aug;93(8):929-36. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5407. Br J Surg. 2006. PMID: 16845693 Review.
-
Pancreaticogastrostomy has advantages over pancreaticojejunostomy on pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt A):18-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.10.020. Epub 2016 Oct 18. Int J Surg. 2016. PMID: 27768898
Cited by
-
Transduodenal ampullectomy provides a less invasive technique to cure early ampullary cancer.BMC Surg. 2016 Jun 1;16(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0156-z. BMC Surg. 2016. PMID: 27251044 Free PMC article.
-
Anastomotic bleeding from invaginated pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatoduodenectomy: incidence, risk factors, treatment and prevention.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024 Jul 27;409(1):229. doi: 10.1007/s00423-024-03400-1. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2024. PMID: 39066838
-
The Tight Adaptation at Pancreatic Anastomosis Without Parenchymal Laceration: An Institutional Experience in Introducing and Modifying the New Procedure.World J Surg. 2015 Aug;39(8):2014-22. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3075-8. World J Surg. 2015. PMID: 25894407
-
Pancreaticogastrostomy versus pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Surg Today. 2015 May;45(5):585-94. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-1030-1. Epub 2014 Sep 26. Surg Today. 2015. PMID: 25256939
-
Polyester Preserves the Highest Breaking Point After Prolonged Incubation in Pancreatic Juice.J Gastrointest Surg. 2018 Mar;22(3):444-450. doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3558-z. Epub 2017 Aug 31. J Gastrointest Surg. 2018. PMID: 28861698
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical