Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May;63(610):e309-17.
doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X667169.

Assessing depression severity using the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework depression indicators: a systematic review

Elizabeth J Shaw  1 , Daniel Sutcliffe, Terence Lacey, Tim Stokes
Affiliations

Assessing depression severity using the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework depression indicators: a systematic review

Elizabeth J Shaw et al. Br J Gen Pract. 2013 May.

Erratum in

  • Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Jun;63(611):293

Abstract

Background: Depression is a major cause of chronic ill-health and is managed in primary care. Indicators on depression severity assessment were introduced into the UK Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) in 2006 and 2009. QOF is a pay-for-performance scheme and indicators should have evidence to support their use; potential unintended consequences should also have been considered.

Aim: To review the effectiveness of routine assessment of depression severity using structured tools in primary care, and to determine the views of GPs and patients regarding their use.

Design: Systematic review.

Method: Studies were identified by searching electronic databases; study selection, data abstraction, and quality assessment were carried out by one reviewer, with checks from other authors and GRADE (grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation) tables completed for included effectiveness studies.

Results: Eight studies met the eligibility criteria. There was very low-quality evidence that assessing severity in a structured way at diagnosis using a validated tool led to interventions that were appropriate to the severity of depression. Patients and GPs had different perceptions of the assessment of depression at diagnosis, with patients being more positive. GPs highlighted unintended consequences. There was low-quality evidence that structured assessment at follow-up led to increased rates of remission and response, but changes to management were not seen. Patients used this assessment to measure their own response to treatment.

Conclusion: Any estimate of the effect of structured assessment of depression severity in UK general practice is uncertain. GPs consider routine use of questionnaires as incentivised by the QOF has unintended consequences, which could adversely affect patient care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of the process.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

    1. Roland M. Linking physicians’ pay to the quality of care — a major experiment in the United Kingdom. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(14):1448–1454. - PubMed
    1. Committee on Redesigning Health Insurance Performance Measures PaPIP . Rewarding provider performance: aligning incentives in Medicare. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2007.
    1. McDonald R, Roland M. Pay for performance in primary care in England and California: comparison of unintended consequences. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(2):121–127. - PMC - PubMed
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence . Depression. The treatment and management of depression in adults. CG90. London: NICE; 2009.
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence . Depression in adults with a chronic physical health problem. Treatment and management. CG91. London: NICE; 2009.

Publication types