The bicipital tuberosity and distal radius are unreliable landmarks for radial head implant alignment
- PMID: 23643585
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.02.013
The bicipital tuberosity and distal radius are unreliable landmarks for radial head implant alignment
Abstract
Background: As more anatomic asymmetric radial head implants emerge, it is necessary to determine the optimal landmarks to ensure correct rotational orientation. The bicipital tuberosity and distal radius are possible bony landmarks that can be used for rotational alignment of asymmetric prostheses; however, they have not been validated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability of the bicipital tuberosity and distal radius as rotational landmarks for orientation of asymmetric radial head prostheses.
Methods: Measurements were made from computer tomography scans of 50 elbows in order to determine the rotational relationships between the radial head, bicipital tuberosity, biceps tendon footprint, and distal radius.
Results: The maximum radial head diameter was oriented 65° ± 28° from the bicipital tuberosity, 119° ± 38° from the biceps tendon footprint, 82° ± 29° from the radial styloid, and 76° ± 28° from the volar surface of the distal radius. All of these landmarks had a significantly greater variance than a proposed acceptable clinical tolerance of 10° (P < .001).
Conclusion: The results demonstrate that the measured landmarks show no consistent rotational relationship with the maximum diameter of the radial head. In order to maximize the utility of more anatomic asymmetric radial head implant systems, further studies are necessary to identify more reliable rotational landmarks to ensure optimal implant positioning.
Keywords: Anatomic Study; Imaging; Radial head arthroplasty; bicipital tuberosity; elbow; implant design; radial head fracture.
Copyright © 2013 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
The anatomy of the bicipital tuberosity and distal biceps tendon.J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007 Jan-Feb;16(1):122-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.04.012. Epub 2006 Oct 19. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007. PMID: 17055747
-
How to Avoid Posterior Interosseous Nerve Injury During Single-Incision Distal Biceps Repair Drilling.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Feb;477(2):424-431. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000534. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019. PMID: 30444757 Free PMC article.
-
The distal biceps tendon: footprint and relevant clinical anatomy.J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Oct;32(8):1225-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2007.05.027. J Hand Surg Am. 2007. PMID: 17923307
-
Optimal Prosthesis Sizing for Radial Head Arthroplasty: A Review of Current Evidence and Guidelines.JBJS Rev. 2021 Apr 22;9(4). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00178. JBJS Rev. 2021. PMID: 33886524 Review.
-
Irreducible anteromedial radial head dislocation without fracture caused by transposed biceps tendon in an adult: A case report and literature review.Chin J Traumatol. 2024 May;27(3):180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2023.05.004. Epub 2023 Jun 2. Chin J Traumatol. 2024. PMID: 37344287 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Reliability of the Sigmoid Notch Classification of the Distal Radioulnar Joint.J Wrist Surg. 2022 Nov 18;12(4):359-363. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758709. eCollection 2023 Aug. J Wrist Surg. 2022. PMID: 37564616 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials