Pathological outcomes in men with low risk and very low risk prostate cancer: implications on the practice of active surveillance
- PMID: 23643603
- PMCID: PMC3978170
- DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.071
Pathological outcomes in men with low risk and very low risk prostate cancer: implications on the practice of active surveillance
Abstract
Purpose: We assessed oncologic outcomes at surgery in men with low risk and very low risk prostate cancer who were candidates for active surveillance.
Materials and methods: In a prospectively collected institutional database, we identified 7,486 subjects eligible for active surveillance who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy. Candidates were designated as being at low risk (stage T1c/T2a, prostate specific antigen 10 ng/ml or less, and Gleason score 6 or less) or very low risk (stage T1c, prostate specific antigen density 0.15 or less, Gleason score 6 or less, 2 or fewer positive biopsy cores, 50% or less cancer involvement per core) based on preoperative data. Adverse findings were Gleason score upgrade (score 7 or greater) and nonorgan confined cancer on surgical pathology. The relative risk of adverse findings in men at low risk with very low risk disease was evaluated in a multivariate model using Poisson regression.
Results: A total of 7,333 subjects met the criteria for low risk disease and 153 had very low risk disease. The proportion of subjects at low risk found to have Gleason score upgrade or nonorgan confined cancer on final pathology was 21.8% and 23.1%, respectively. Corresponding values in those at very low risk were 13.1% and 8.5%, respectively. After adjusting for age, race, year of surgery, body mass index, and prostate specific antigen at diagnosis, the relative risk of Gleason score upgrade in men with low risk vs very low risk disease was 1.89 (95% CI 1.21-2.95). The relative risk of nonorgan confined cancer was 2.06 (95% CI 1.19-3.57).
Conclusions: Men with very low risk prostate cancer were at significantly lower risk for adverse findings at surgery compared to those with low risk disease. These data support the stratification of low risk cancer when selecting and counseling men who may be appropriate for active surveillance.
Keywords: AS; BMI; GS; Gleason score; LR; NOCC; PSA; VLR; active surveillance; body mass index; disease progression; low risk; nonorgan confined cancer; prostate; prostate specific antigen; prostatic neoplasms; risk; treatment outcome; very LR.
Copyright © 2013 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Editorial comment.J Urol. 2013 Oct;190(4):1223. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.139. Epub 2013 Jul 12. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23856519 No abstract available.
-
Editorial comment.J Urol. 2013 Oct;190(4):1222-3. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.04.138. Epub 2013 Jul 12. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23856521 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
National Comprehensive Cancer Network® Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer-Is Active Surveillance Appropriate?J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1196-1201. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.12.049. Epub 2017 Dec 26. J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29288120
-
Adverse Pathologic Findings for Men Electing Immediate Radical Prostatectomy: Defining a Favorable Intermediate-Risk Group.JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;4(1):89-92. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.1879. JAMA Oncol. 2018. PMID: 28715578 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.J Urol. 2018 May;199(5):1188-1195. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.11.116. Epub 2017 Dec 7. J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29225057
-
Prospective evaluation of men with stage T1C adenocarcinoma of the prostate.J Urol. 1997 Jun;157(6):2206-9. J Urol. 1997. PMID: 9146616 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Gleason 6 Prostate Cancer: Translating Biology into Population Health.J Urol. 2015 Sep;194(3):626-34. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.01.126. Epub 2015 Apr 4. J Urol. 2015. PMID: 25849602 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer: Use, Outcomes, Imaging, and Diagnostic Tools.Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016;35:e235-45. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_159244. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2016. PMID: 27249729 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Comparative rates of upstaging and upgrading in Caucasian and Korean prostate cancer patients eligible for active surveillance.PLoS One. 2017 Nov 14;12(11):e0186026. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186026. eCollection 2017. PLoS One. 2017. PMID: 29136019 Free PMC article.
-
Characterizing indeterminate (Likert-score 3/5) peripheral zone prostate lesions with PSA density, PI-RADS scoring and qualitative descriptors on multiparametric MRI.Br J Radiol. 2018 Feb;91(1083):20170645. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170645. Epub 2017 Dec 15. Br J Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29189042 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical role of pathological downgrading after radical prostatectomy in patients with biopsy confirmed Gleason score 3 + 4 prostate cancer.BJU Int. 2015 Jan;115(1):81-6. doi: 10.1111/bju.12769. Epub 2014 Aug 13. BJU Int. 2015. PMID: 24725760 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Relevance of Circulating Tumor Cells in Prostate Cancer Management.Biomedicines. 2021 Sep 8;9(9):1179. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9091179. Biomedicines. 2021. PMID: 34572366 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, et al. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277. - PubMed
-
- Welch HG, Black WC. Overdiagnosis in cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:605. - PubMed
-
- Loeb S, Roehl KA, Helfand BT, et al. Complications of open radical retropubic prostatectomy in potential candidates for active monitoring. Urology. 2008;72:887. - PubMed
-
- Cooperberg MR, Carroll PR, Klotz L. Active surveillance for prostate cancer: progress and promise. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3669. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous