Effectiveness of renal denervation therapy for resistant hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 23644092
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.04.010
Effectiveness of renal denervation therapy for resistant hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to determine the current effectiveness and safety of sympathetic renal denervation (RDN) for resistant hypertension.
Background: RDN is a novel approach that has been evaluated in multiple small studies.
Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies evaluating the effect of RDN in patients with resistant hypertension. Studies were stratified according to controlled versus uncontrolled design and analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis models.
Results: We identified 2 randomized controlled trials, 1 observational study with a control group, and 9 observational studies without a control group. In controlled studies, there was a reduction in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) at 6 months of -28.9 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI]: -37.2 to -20.6 mm Hg) and -11.0 mm Hg (95% CI: -16.4 to -5.7 mm Hg), respectively, compared with medically treated patients (for both, p < 0.0001). In uncontrolled studies, there was a reduction in mean systolic and diastolic BP at 6 months of -25.0 mm Hg (95% CI: -29.9 to -20.1 mm Hg) and -10.0 mm Hg (95% CI: -12.5 to -7.5 mm Hg), respectively, compared with pre-RDN values (for both, p < 0.00001). There was no difference in the effect of RDN according to the 5 catheters employed. Reported procedural complications included 1 renal artery dissection and 4 femoral pseudoaneurysms.
Conclusions: RDN resulted in a substantial reduction in mean BP at 6 months in patients with resistant hypertension. The decrease in BP was similar irrespective of study design and type of catheter employed. Large randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are needed to confirm the sustained efficacy and safety of RDN.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Reply: no support for renal denervation in a meta-analysis.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Nov 19;62(21):2030. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.09.009. Epub 2013 Sep 20. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 24055847 No abstract available.
-
No support for renal denervation in a meta-analysis.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Nov 19;62(21):2029-2030. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.094. Epub 2013 Sep 20. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013. PMID: 24060456 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
