The effect of obesity on fecal incontinence symptom distress, quality of life, and diagnostic testing measures in women
- PMID: 23644811
- PMCID: PMC3773284
- DOI: 10.1007/s00192-013-2103-1
The effect of obesity on fecal incontinence symptom distress, quality of life, and diagnostic testing measures in women
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: Weight-loss has been demonstrated to result in an improvement in fecal incontinence (FI) severity; however, there is a paucity of data addressing the differential impact of FI on the quality of life (QOL) and results of diagnostic testing across BMI categories. We wished to evaluate symptom distress, QOL, and diagnostic testing parameters among normal, overweight, and obese women with fecal incontinence.
Methods: Women undergoing evaluation for FI between 2003 and 2012 were identified. Participants completed validated, symptom-specific distress, impact, and general QOL measures including the Modified Manchester Questionnaire (MMHQ), which includes the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), and the mental and physical component summary scores, MCS and PCS, respectively, of the Short Form-12. Anorectal manometry measures were also included. Multivariate regression analyses were performed.
Results: Participants included 407 women with a mean age ± SD of 56 ± 13. Multivariate analyses revealed no differences in symptom-specific distress and impact as measured by MMHQ, MCS, and PCS across BMI groups; however, obese women had increased resting and squeeze pressures compared with normal and overweight BMI women (p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001; p = 0.007 and p = 0.004 respectively).
Conclusions: Obese women with FI did not have more general impact and symptom-specific distress and impact on quality of life compared with normal and overweight women. Obese women with FI had higher baseline anal resting and squeeze pressures suggesting a lower threshold to leakage with pressure increases.
Similar articles
-
The Differential Impact of Flatal Incontinence in Women With Anal Versus Fecal Incontinence.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015 Nov-Dec;21(6):339-42. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000189. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015. PMID: 26506162 Free PMC article.
-
Characterization of symptom severity and impact on four fecal incontinence phenotypes in women presenting for evaluation.Neurourol Urodyn. 2021 Jan;40(1):237-244. doi: 10.1002/nau.24541. Epub 2020 Oct 20. Neurourol Urodyn. 2021. PMID: 33080084 Free PMC article.
-
Fecal Incontinence Symptoms and Impact in Older Versus Younger Women Seeking Care.Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Jun;62(6):733-738. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001353. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019. PMID: 31094960 Free PMC article.
-
Prevention of urinary and fecal incontinence in adults.Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Dec;(161):1-379. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007. PMID: 18457475 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of fecal incontinence and its treatment on quality of life in women.Womens Health (Lond). 2015 Mar;11(2):225-38. doi: 10.2217/whe.14.66. Womens Health (Lond). 2015. PMID: 25776296 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Anorectal Manometry Testing in Left Lateral and Lithotomy Positions.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020 Oct;26(10):630-634. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000620. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2020. PMID: 30346318 Free PMC article.
-
Tools for fecal incontinence assessment: lessons for inflammatory bowel disease trials based on a systematic review.United European Gastroenterol J. 2020 Oct;8(8):886-922. doi: 10.1177/2050640620943699. Epub 2020 Jul 17. United European Gastroenterol J. 2020. PMID: 32677555 Free PMC article.
-
The Differential Impact of Flatal Incontinence in Women With Anal Versus Fecal Incontinence.Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015 Nov-Dec;21(6):339-42. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000189. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2015. PMID: 26506162 Free PMC article.
-
Does Bariatric Surgery Improve Faecal Incontinence? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obes Surg. 2021 Jul;31(7):2942-2953. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05360-7. Epub 2021 Apr 14. Obes Surg. 2021. PMID: 33852150 Free PMC article.
-
Size of Pelvic Outlet as a Potential Risk Factor of Fecal Incontinence: A Population-Based Exploratory Analysis.Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025 Jan 1;16(1):e00789. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000789. Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2025. PMID: 39498983 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Norton C, Whitehead W, Bliss DZ, Harari D, Lang J. Conservative and Pharmacological Management of Faecal Incontinence in Adults. In: Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A, editors. Incontinence. Paris, France: Health Publication Ltd; 2009. p. 1343.
-
- Nelson RL, et al. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology. 2004;126:3–7. - PubMed
-
- Quander CR, Morris MC, Melson J, et al. Prevalence of and factors associated with fecal incontinence in a large community study of older individuals. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100:905–9. - PubMed
-
- Sailer M, Bussen D, Debus ES, et al. Quality of life in patients with benign anorectal disorders. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1716–9. - PubMed
-
- Johansson JK, Lafferty J, et al. Epidemiology of fecal incontinence: The silent affliction. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91:33–6. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical