Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May 3;10(5):1845-60.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph10051845.

Valuing human leptospirosis prevention using the opportunity cost of labor

Affiliations

Valuing human leptospirosis prevention using the opportunity cost of labor

Joseph Arbiol et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Leptospirosis is a serious public health concern in the Philippines, not only because of its increasing incidence rate, but also because of its significant health and economic impacts. Despite its relatively high seroprevalence, knowledge on the economic burden of disease, particularly on the value that the society places on disease prevention remains limited. Obtaining such information is important within the context of public health policy. This study was conducted in Metro Manila to determine the economic burden of leptospirosis, by asking respondents about their willingness to contribute to labor (WTCL) for the prevention of leptospirosis. The respondents pledged an average labor contribution of 10.66 h/month. The average WTCL corresponded to a monetary value of US$4.01 per month when valued using the opportunity cost of labor (leisure rate of time). From the monetized labor contribution, the total economic value of preventing leptospirosis was estimated at US$124.97 million per annum, which represents 1.13% of Metro Manila's gross domestic product (GDP). Estimates from a Tobit regression model identified the respondents' knowledge regarding leptospirosis, the susceptibility of their homes to flooding, and the proximity of their homes to sewers as significant factors to consider when developing resource contribution programs for leptospirosis prevention. More efforts need to be made in developing community level preventive programs, and in improving public's knowledge and awareness about leptospirosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Levett P.N. Leptospirosis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2001;14:296–326. doi: 10.1128/CMR.14.2.296-326.2001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bharti A.R., Nally J.E., Ricaldi J.N., Matthias M.A., Diaz M.M., Lovett M.A., Levett P.N., Gilman R.H., Willig M.R., Gotuzzo E., Vinetz J.M. Leptospirosis: A zoonotic disease of global importance. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2003;3:757–771. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(03)00830-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levett P.N. Leptospirosis: A forgotten zoonosis? Clin. Appl. Immunol. Rev. 2004;4:435–448. doi: 10.1016/j.cair.2004.08.001. - DOI
    1. Yanagihara Y., Villanueva S.Y.A.M., Yoshida S.-i., Okamoto Y., Masuzawa T. Current status of leptospirosis in Japan and Philippines. Comp. Immunol. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2007;30:399–413. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2007.05.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Villanueva S.Y.A.M., Ezoe H., Baterna R.A., Yanagihara Y., Muto M., Koizumi N., Fukui T., Okamoto Y., Masuzawa T., Cavinta L.L., Gloriani N.G., Yoshida S.-i. Serologic and molecular studies of leptospira and leptospirosis among rats in the Philippines. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 2010;82:889–898. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.09-0711. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources