200 consecutive laparoscopic pancreatic resections performed with a robotically controlled laparoscope holder
- PMID: 23644837
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-013-2969-5
200 consecutive laparoscopic pancreatic resections performed with a robotically controlled laparoscope holder
Abstract
Introduction: Because of the potential benefit of robotics in pancreatic surgery, we review our experience at two minimally invasive pancreatic surgery centers that utilize a robotically controlled laparoscope holder to see if smaller robots that enable the operating surgeon to maintain contact with the patient may have a role in the treatment of pancreatic disease.
Methods: From March 1994 to June 2011, a total of 200 laparoscopic pancreatic procedures utilizing a robotically controlled laparoscope holder were performed.
Results: A total of 72 duodenopancreatectomies, 67 distal pancreatectomies, 23 enucleations, 20 pancreatic cyst drainage procedures, 5 necrosectomies, 5 atypical pancreatic resections, 4 total pancreatectomies, and 4 central pancreatectomies were performed. Fourteen patients required conversion to an open approach and eight a hand-assisted one. A total of 24 patients suffered a major complication. Sixteen patients developed a pancreatic leak and 19 patients required reoperation. Major complications occurred in 14 patients and pancreatic leaks occurred in 13 patients. Ten patients required conversion to a lap-assisted or open approach and six patients required reoperation.
Conclusions: Currently, a robotically assisted approach using a camera holder seems the only way to incorporate some of the benefits of robotics in pancreatic surgery while maintaining haptics and contact with the patient.
Similar articles
-
Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery of the entire gland: initial experience.Minerva Chir. 2011 Aug;66(4):269-80. Minerva Chir. 2011. PMID: 21873961
-
Hepatobilio-pancreatic robotic surgery: initial experience from a single center institute.J Robot Surg. 2017 Sep;11(3):355-365. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0663-z. Epub 2016 Dec 30. J Robot Surg. 2017. PMID: 28039607
-
Should all distal pancreatectomies be performed laparoscopically?Adv Surg. 2009;43:283-300. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2009.02.013. Adv Surg. 2009. PMID: 19845186 Review.
-
Robot-assisted minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy is superior to the laparoscopic technique.Ann Surg. 2013 Jan;257(1):128-32. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31825fff08. Ann Surg. 2013. PMID: 22868357
-
Laparoscopic pancreatic resection.Chir Ital. 2001 May-Jun;53(3):279-89. Chir Ital. 2001. PMID: 11452812 Review.
Cited by
-
Computer-assisted abdominal surgery: new technologies.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015 Apr;400(3):273-81. doi: 10.1007/s00423-015-1289-8. Epub 2015 Feb 21. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2015. PMID: 25701196 Review.
-
Development of Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery: an Evidence-Based Systematic Review of Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Approaches.J Gastrointest Surg. 2016 Sep;20(9):1658-65. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3204-1. Epub 2016 Jul 13. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016. PMID: 27412319
-
A learning robot for cognitive camera control in minimally invasive surgery.Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):5365-5374. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08509-8. Epub 2021 Apr 27. Surg Endosc. 2021. PMID: 33904989 Free PMC article.
-
Laparoscopic versus robotic major hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Endosc. 2021 Feb;35(2):524-535. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08008-2. Epub 2020 Sep 28. Surg Endosc. 2021. PMID: 32989544
-
Is robotic pancreatic surgery finally ready for prime-time?Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020 Oct;9(5):650-653. doi: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.12.05. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2020. PMID: 33163516 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials