Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2013 Oct;27(10):3781-91.
doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-2969-5. Epub 2013 May 4.

200 consecutive laparoscopic pancreatic resections performed with a robotically controlled laparoscope holder

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

200 consecutive laparoscopic pancreatic resections performed with a robotically controlled laparoscope holder

Andrew A Gumbs et al. Surg Endosc. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Introduction: Because of the potential benefit of robotics in pancreatic surgery, we review our experience at two minimally invasive pancreatic surgery centers that utilize a robotically controlled laparoscope holder to see if smaller robots that enable the operating surgeon to maintain contact with the patient may have a role in the treatment of pancreatic disease.

Methods: From March 1994 to June 2011, a total of 200 laparoscopic pancreatic procedures utilizing a robotically controlled laparoscope holder were performed.

Results: A total of 72 duodenopancreatectomies, 67 distal pancreatectomies, 23 enucleations, 20 pancreatic cyst drainage procedures, 5 necrosectomies, 5 atypical pancreatic resections, 4 total pancreatectomies, and 4 central pancreatectomies were performed. Fourteen patients required conversion to an open approach and eight a hand-assisted one. A total of 24 patients suffered a major complication. Sixteen patients developed a pancreatic leak and 19 patients required reoperation. Major complications occurred in 14 patients and pancreatic leaks occurred in 13 patients. Ten patients required conversion to a lap-assisted or open approach and six patients required reoperation.

Conclusions: Currently, a robotically assisted approach using a camera holder seems the only way to incorporate some of the benefits of robotics in pancreatic surgery while maintaining haptics and contact with the patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World J Surg. 2010 Sep;34(9):2109-14 - PubMed
    1. Surg Endosc. 2004 Feb;18(2):182-5 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 2008 Mar;143(3):289-95; discussion 295 - PubMed
    1. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1994 Jun;39(3):178-84 - PubMed
    1. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011 Mar;18(2):287-91 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources