Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May 2;3(5):e002154.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002154.

A systematic review of the effect of red blood cell transfusion on mortality: evidence from large-scale observational studies published between 2006 and 2010

Affiliations

A systematic review of the effect of red blood cell transfusion on mortality: evidence from large-scale observational studies published between 2006 and 2010

Sally Hopewell et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To carry out a systematic review of recently published large-scale observational studies assessing the effects of red blood cell transfusion (RBCT) on mortality, with particular emphasis on the statistical methods used to adjust for confounding. Given the limited number of randomised trials of the efficacy of RBCT, clinicians often use evidence from observational studies. However, confounding factors, for example, individuals receiving blood generally being sicker than those who do not, make their interpretation challenging.

Design: Systematic review.

Information sources: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE for studies published from 1 January 2006 to 31 December 2010.

Eligibility criteria for included studies: We included prospective cohort, case-control studies or retrospective analyses of databases or disease registers where the effect of risk factors for mortality or survival was examined. Studies must have included more than 1000 participants receiving RBCT for any cause. We assessed the effects of RBCT versus no RBCT and different volumes and age of RBCT.

Results: -32 studies were included in the review; 23 assessed the effects of RBCT versus no RBCT; 5 assessed different volumes and 4 older versus newer RBCT. There was a considerable variability in the patient populations, study designs and level of statistical adjustment. Overall, most studies showed a higher rate of mortality when comparing patients who received RBCT with those who did not, even when these rates were adjusted for confounding; the majority of these increases were statistically significant. The same pattern was observed in studies where protection from bias was likely to be greater, such as prospective studies.

Conclusions: Recent observational studies do show a consistently adverse effect of RBCT on mortality. Whether this is a true effect remains uncertain as it is possible that even the best conducted adjustments cannot completely eliminate the impact of confounding.

Keywords: Epidemiology; Intensive & critical care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study inclusion (1 January 2006 to 31 December 2010).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Effect of red blood cell transfusion versus no red blood cell transfusion on mortality (adjusted results).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blajchman MA. Landmark studies that have changed the practice of transfusion medicine. Transfusion 2005;45:1523–30 - PubMed
    1. Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, et al. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 2003;7:1–173 - PubMed
    1. Murphy MF, Stanworth SJ, Yazer M. Transfusion practice and safety: current status and possibilities for improvement. Vox Sang 2011;100:46–59 - PubMed
    1. Goodnough LT, Shander A. Patient blood management. Anesthesiology 2012;116:1367–76 - PubMed
    1. NHS blood transfusion and transplant/Royal College of Physicians national comparative audit of blood transfusion programme. http://hospital blood co uk/safe_use/clinical_audit/national_comparative/indexasp (accessed 5 Mar 2013)

LinkOut - more resources