Mid-Term Follow-Up of Drug-Eluting Stenting for In-Stent Restenosis: Bare-Metal Stents versus Drug-Eluting Stents
- PMID: 23646043
- PMCID: PMC3587669
Mid-Term Follow-Up of Drug-Eluting Stenting for In-Stent Restenosis: Bare-Metal Stents versus Drug-Eluting Stents
Abstract
Background: Despite major advances in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a therapeutic challenge. We sought to compare the mid-term clinical outcomes after treatment with repeat drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation ("DES sandwich" technique) with DES placement in the bare-metal stent (DES-in-BMS) in a "real world" setting.
Methods: We retrospectively identified and analyzed clinical and angiographic data on 194 patients previously treated with the DES who underwent repeat PCI for ISR with a DES or a BMS. ISR was defined, by visual assessment, as a luminal stenosis greater than 50% within the stent or within 5 mm of its edges. We recorded the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and the need for target vessel revascularization (TVR).
Results: Of the 194 study participants, 130 were men (67.0%) and the mean ± SD of age was 57.0 ± 10.4 years, ranging from 37 to 80 years. In-hospital events (death and Q-wave myocardial infarction) occurred at a similar frequency in both groups. Outcomes at twelve months were also similar between the groups with cumulative clinical MACE at one-year follow-up of 9.6% and 11.3% in the DES-in-BMS and the DES-in-DES groups, respectively (p value = 0.702). Although not significant, there was a trend toward a higher TVR rate in the intra-DES ISR group as compared to the intra-BMS ISR group (0.9% BMS vs. 5.2% DES; p value = 0.16).
Conclusion: Our study suggests that the outcome of the patients presenting with ISR did not seem to be different between the two groups of DES-in-DES and DES-in-BMS at one-year follow-up, except for a trend toward more frequent TVR in the DES-in-DES group. Repeat DES implantation for DES restenosis could be feasible and safe with a relatively low incidence of MACE at mid-term follow-up.
Keywords: Angioplasty; Drug-eluting stent; Graft occlusion, vascular; Prognosis; Treatment outcome.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Clinical Outcomes of Drug-Eluting versus Bare-Metal In-Stent Restenosis after the Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent or Drug-Eluting Balloon: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Jun 26;2020:8179849. doi: 10.1155/2020/8179849. eCollection 2020. J Interv Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 32684867 Free PMC article.
-
Outcome differences with the use of drug-eluting stents for the treatment of in-stent restenosis of bare-metal stents versus drug-eluting stents.Am J Cardiol. 2009 Feb 15;103(4):491-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.09.107. Am J Cardiol. 2009. PMID: 19195508
-
Effectiveness of everolimus-eluting stents in the treatment of drug-eluting stent versus bare-metal stent restenosis.Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Nov;23(7):492-6. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328358a58f. Coron Artery Dis. 2012. PMID: 22990414
-
Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stent implantation for the treatment of in-stent restenosis occurring within bare-metal stent and drug-eluting stent.J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2010 Aug;11(8):553-60. doi: 10.1631/jzus.B1001002. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2010. PMID: 20669344 Free PMC article.
-
Drug-Eluting Versus Bare Metal Stents in Saphenous Vein Graft Intervention: An Updated Comprehensive Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019 Sep;20(9):758-767. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2018.11.013. Epub 2018 Nov 22. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2019. PMID: 30503811
Cited by
-
Clinical Outcomes of Drug-Eluting versus Bare-Metal In-Stent Restenosis after the Treatment of Drug-Eluting Stent or Drug-Eluting Balloon: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Jun 26;2020:8179849. doi: 10.1155/2020/8179849. eCollection 2020. J Interv Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 32684867 Free PMC article.
-
Performance of dual-source CT with high pitch spiral mode for coronary stent patency compared with invasive coronary angiography.J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016 Oct;13(10):817-823. doi: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.10.002. J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016. PMID: 27928222 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mehran R, Dangas G, Abizaid AS, Mintz GS, Lansky AJ, Satler LF, Pichard AD, Kent KM, Stone GW, Leon MB. Angiographic patterns of in-stent restenosis: classification and implications for long-term outcome. Circulation. 1999;100:1872–1878. - PubMed
-
- Radke PW, Kaiser A, Frost C, Sigwart U. Outcome after treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis; results from a systematic review using meta-analysis techniques. Eur Heart J. 2003;24:266–273. - PubMed
-
- Dangas GD, Claessen BE, Caixeta A, Sanidas EA, Mintz GS, Mehran R. In-stent restenosis in the drug-eluting stent era. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1897–907. - PubMed
-
- Saia F, Lemos PA, Arampatzis CA, Hoye A, Degertekin M, Tanabe K, Sianos G, Smits PC, van der Giessen WJ, de Feyter PJ, van Domburg RT, Serruys PW. Routine sirolimus eluting stent implantation for unselected in-stent restenosis: insights from the Rapamycin Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry. Heart. 2004;90:1183–1188. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Dibra A, Kastrati A, Mehilli J, Pache J, Schuhlen H, von Beckerath N, Ulm K, Wessely R, Dirschinger J, Schomig A. Paclitaxel-eluting or sirolimus-eluting stents to prevent restenosis in diabetic patients. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:663–670. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous