Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2012 Jun 27;3(2):248-57.
doi: 10.4338/ACI-2012-03-RA-0010. Print 2012.

Classifying health information technology patient safety related incidents - an approach used in Wales

Affiliations
Review

Classifying health information technology patient safety related incidents - an approach used in Wales

D Warm et al. Appl Clin Inform. .

Abstract

Interest in the field of patient safety incident reporting and analysis with respect to Health Information Technology (HIT) has been growing over recent years as the development, implementation and reliance on HIT systems becomes ever more prevalent. One of the rationales for capturing patient safety incidents is to learn from failures in the delivery of care and must form part of a feedback loop which also includes analysis; investigation and monitoring. With the advent of new technologies and organizational programs of delivery the emphasis is increasingly upon analyzing HIT incidents. This thematic review had two objectives, to test the applicability of a framework specifically designed to categorize HIT incidents and to review the Welsh incidents as communicated via the national incident reporting system in order to understand their implications for healthcare. The incidents were those reported as IT/ telecommunications failure/ overload. Incidents were searched for within a national reporting system using a standardized search strategy for incidents occurring between 1(st) January 2009 and 31(st) May 2011. 149 incident reports were identified and classified. The majority (77%) of which were machine related (technical problems) such as access problems; computer system down/too slow; display issues; and software malfunctions. A further 10% (n = 15) of incidents were down to human-computer interaction issues and 13% (n = 19) incidents, mainly telephone related, could not be classified using the framework being tested. On the basis of this review of incidents, it is recommended that the framework be expanded to include hardware malfunctions and the wrong record retrieved/missing data associated with a machine output error (as opposed to human error). In terms of the implications for clinical practice, the incidents reviewed highlighted critical issues including the access problems particularly relating to the use of mobile technologies.

Keywords: Incident Reporting; Medical informatics; Patient Safety; Risk Management; Wales.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Magrabi framework used for classification of 149 incidents reported to the NRLS as IT /telecommunications failure / overload in Wales

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sittig D, Classen D. Safe electronic health record use requires a comprehensive monitoring and evaluation framework. JAMA 2010; 303: 450–451 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine Health IT and Patient Safety: Building Safer Systems for Better Care. Washington DC: The National Academies Press; 2012. - PubMed
    1. Myers R, Jones S, Sittig D. Review of reported clinical information system adverse events in US food and drug administration databases. App Clin Informatics 2011; 2: 63–74 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Benn J, et al. Feedback from incident reporting: information and action to improve patient safety. Qual Saf Health Care 2009; 18: 11–21 - PubMed
    1. Newton RC, et al. Making existing technology safer in healthcare. Qual Saf Health Care 2010; 19: i15-i24 - PubMed