Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May;84(5):292-7.
doi: 10.4174/jkss.2013.84.5.292. Epub 2013 Apr 24.

The results of aspiration thrombecomy in the endovascular treatment for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis

Jae Hoon Lee  1 , Woo Hyung Kwun, Bo Yang Suh
Affiliations

The results of aspiration thrombecomy in the endovascular treatment for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis

Jae Hoon Lee et al. J Korean Surg Soc. 2013 May.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of aspiration thrombectomy (AT) in the endovascular treatment for iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) through the comparison of catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) alone group and CDT with AT group.

Methods: From November 2001 to April 2011, 100 patients received endovascular treatment with CDT alone or CDT with AT for iliofemoral DVT at Yeungnam University Medical Center. We compared procedure, clinical outcomes and complications between the two groups.

Results: The mean age of patients was 60.48 ± 14.57 years. The patients consisted of 41 men and 59 women. CDT alone and CDT with AT were performed in 29 and 71 patients, respectively. The mean procedural time of the CDT-alone group was longer than the CDT with AT group (P < 0.001) and dose of urokinase used during the procedure significantly decreased in the CDT with AT group (P < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two groups. Cases of pulmonary embolism was not noted in each group in our series, but entrapped thrombus during procedure was noted in 6 of 37 in the CDT with AT group and 0 of 9 in the CDT-alone group among 46 patients with prophylactic inferior vena cava (IVC) filter insertion.

Conclusion: In conclusion, CDT with AT is safe and effective for the treatment of an acute iliofemoral DVT. In AT treatment, prophylactic IVC filter insertion should be considered for the prevention of pulmonary embolism by floating thrombi.

Keywords: Catheters; Deep vein thrombosis; Mechanical thrombectomy; Thrombolysis; Vena cava filters.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The patency rate of iliac vein by thrombus dissolution (P = 0.546). CDT, catheter directed thrombolysis; AT, aspiration thrombectomy.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. White RH. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003;107(23 Suppl 1):I4–I8. - PubMed
    1. Cushman M, Tsai AW, White RH, Heckbert SR, Rosamond WD, Enright P, et al. Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in two cohorts: the longitudinal investigation of thromboembolism etiology. Am J Med. 2004;117:19–25. - PubMed
    1. Jang MJ, Bang SM, Oh D. Incidence of venous thromboembolism in Korea: from the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9:85–91. - PubMed
    1. Cohen AT, Agnelli G, Anderson FA, Arcelus JI, Bergqvist D, Brecht JG, et al. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) in Europe. The number of VTE events and associated morbidity and mortality. Thromb Haemost. 2007;98:756–764. - PubMed
    1. Nyamekye I, Merker L. Management of proximal deep vein thrombosis. Phlebology. 2012;27(Suppl 2):61–72. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources