Retention: type, duration and need for common guidelines. A survey of Norwegian orthodontists
- PMID: 23646321
- DOI: 10.11607/ortho.964
Retention: type, duration and need for common guidelines. A survey of Norwegian orthodontists
Abstract
Aims: To survey retention protocols and need for practical retention guidelines among orthodontists in Norway and to compare the results with similar studies in other countries.
Methods: A questionnaire was mailed to all members of the Norwegian Association of Orthodontists. It included questions about their background and their current retention protocol, as well as their perceived need for common retention guidelines.
Results: The response rate was 77.7% (69.3% males and 30.7% females). The most common maxillary retainer was a combination of a fixed and removable retainer, followed by a clear thermoplastic retainer. In the mandible, a fixed retainer bonded to all anterior teeth was most common (66.4%). Retention in the maxilla lasted 2 to 3 years (34.7%) or 3 to 5 years (23.8%). In the mandible, 41.5% of the orthodontists left the retainer in place for >5 years. When retention lasted more than 3 years, 70% of the orthodontists left the responsibility for retainer checkups to the patients or the general practitioners. The main reason for choosing a certain retention protocol was clinical experience (57.4%). Only 3.5% of the orthodontists based their protocols on information from the literature. Half?of the orthodontists, significantly women, expressed a need for common retention guidelines.
Conclusions: In Norway, bonded retainers alone were reported to be most commonly used in the mandible, while bonded retainers used in combination with a removable retainer appear to be the most commonly used appliances in the maxilla. This is similar to the most frequently used retainers in other countries, but there are disparities in duration and follow-up protocols. Most female orthodontists desire common retention guidelines.
Similar articles
-
Results of a survey-based study to identify common retention practices in the United States.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Feb;137(2):170-7; discussion 177. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.03.023. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010. PMID: 20152670
-
A survey of protocols and trends in orthodontic retention.Prog Orthod. 2017 Oct 9;18(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0185-x. Prog Orthod. 2017. PMID: 28990138 Free PMC article.
-
A survey on orthodontic retention procedures in The Netherlands.Eur J Orthod. 2009 Aug;31(4):432-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn131. Epub 2009 Apr 28. Eur J Orthod. 2009. PMID: 19401355
-
Epidemiologic study of orthodontic retention procedures.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018 Apr;153(4):496-504. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.08.013. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2018. PMID: 29602341 Review.
-
Performance of Hawley-type retainers: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials.Eur J Orthod. 2018 Apr 6;40(2):115-125. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjx036. Eur J Orthod. 2018. PMID: 28549122
Cited by
-
Anterior tooth alignment: A comparison of orthodontic retention regimens 5 years posttreatment.Angle Orthod. 2015 May;85(3):353-9. doi: 10.2319/051414-349.1. Epub 2014 Aug 20. Angle Orthod. 2015. PMID: 25140669 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of fixed orthodontic lingual retainers on PDL stress, root resorption risk, and tooth displacement.Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):20559. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06004-x. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40594943 Free PMC article.
-
In vivo assessment of artefacts in MRI images caused by conventional twistflex and various fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers.J Orofac Orthop. 2024 Jul;85(4):279-288. doi: 10.1007/s00056-022-00445-z. Epub 2023 Jan 26. J Orofac Orthop. 2024. PMID: 36700953 Free PMC article.
-
Stability, survival, and patient satisfaction with CAD/CAM versus conventional multistranded fixed retainers in orthodontic patients: a 6-month follow-up of a two-centre randomized controlled clinical trial.Eur J Orthod. 2023 Feb 10;45(1):58-67. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjac042. Eur J Orthod. 2023. PMID: 35964235 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A Survey of Retention Practices and Protocols Followed Among Orthodontists in India.J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021 Jun;13(Suppl 1):S149-S156. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_615_20. Epub 2021 Jun 5. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2021. PMID: 34447064 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources
Medical