Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May;32(5):499-513.
doi: 10.1037/a0029349.

Close relationship processes and health: implications of attachment theory for health and disease

Paula R Pietromonaco  1 , Bert Uchino, Christine Dunkel Schetter
Affiliations

Close relationship processes and health: implications of attachment theory for health and disease

Paula R Pietromonaco et al. Health Psychol. 2013 May.

Abstract

Objectives: Health psychology has contributed significantly to understanding the link between psychological factors and health and well-being, but it has not often incorporated advances in relationship science into hypothesis generation and study design. We present one example of a theoretical model, following from a major relationship theory (attachment theory) that integrates relationship constructs and processes with biopsychosocial processes and health outcomes.

Method: We briefly describe attachment theory and present a general framework linking it to dyadic relationship processes (relationship behaviors, mediators, and outcomes) and health processes (physiology, affective states, health behavior, and health outcomes). We discuss the utility of the model for research in several health domains (e.g., self-regulation of health behavior, pain, chronic disease) and its implications for interventions and future research.

Results: This framework revealed important gaps in knowledge about relationships and health. Future work in this area will benefit from taking into account individual differences in attachment, adopting a more explicit dyadic approach, examining more integrated models that test for mediating processes, and incorporating a broader range of relationship constructs that have implications for health.

Conclusions: A theoretical framework for studying health that is based in relationship science can accelerate progress by generating new research directions designed to pinpoint the mechanisms through which close relationships promote or undermine health. Furthermore, this knowledge can be applied to develop more effective interventions to help individuals and their relationship partners with health-related challenges.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A Theoretical Framework for Investigating Dyadic Relationship Processes and Health.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Aron A, Aron EN. The self expansion model of motivation and cognition in close relationships and beyond. In: Clark M, Fletcher G, editors. Blackwell Handbook in Social Psychology, Vol. 2: Interpersonal Processes. Oxford: Blackwell; 2001. pp. 478–501.
    1. Badr H. Coping in marital dyads: A contextual perspective on the role of gender and health. Personal Relationships. 2004;11:197–211.
    1. Badr H, Carmack CL, Kashy DA, Cristofanilli M, Revenson TA. Dyadic coping and metastatic breast cancer. Health Psychology. 2010;29:169–180. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barbee AP, Gulley MR, Cunningham MR. Support seeking in personal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 1990;7:531–540.
    1. Belcher AJ, Laurenceau J-P, Graber EC, Cohen LH, Dasch KB, Siegel SD. Daily support in couples coping with early stage breast cancer: Maintaining intimacy during adversity. Health Psychology. 2011;30(6):665–673. - PubMed

Publication types