Variation in the prevalence of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in older adults associated with different research definitions: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004
- PMID: 23647372
- DOI: 10.1111/jgs.12260
Variation in the prevalence of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in older adults associated with different research definitions: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004
Abstract
Objectives: To determine the prevalence range for sarcopenic obesity and its relationship with sex, age, and ethnicity.
Design: Cross-sectional analysis of a population-based sample.
Setting: Noninstitutionalized persons in the United States participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys 1999-2004.
Participants: Subsample of 4,984 subjects aged 60 and older with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition data.
Measurements: Eight definitions of sarcopenic obesity identified from six studies found using a systematic literature review (Baumgartner, Bouchard, Davison, Zoico, Levine, Kim-1,2,3) were applied to the sample. Results were stratified according to sex, age, and ethnicity.
Results: Prevalence of sarcopenic obesity ranged from 4.4% to 84.0% in men and from 3.6% to 94.0% in women. Prevalence was higher in men using definitions from Baumgartner (17.9% vs 13.3%, P < .001), Levine (14.2% vs 6.6%, P < .001), and Kim-1 (30.0% vs 9.3%, P < .001); lower for men using the Davison (4.4% vs 11.1%, P < .001) and Kim-2 (83.7% vs 94.0%) definitions; and the same for men and women using the Bouchard (45.3% vs 44.3%, P = .32) and Kim-3 (75.6% vs 77.0%, P = .51) definitions. For all but one definition, sarcopenic obesity increased with each decade and was lower in non-Hispanic blacks than whites.
Conclusion: Prevalence of sarcopenic obesity in older adults varies up to 26-fold depending on current research definitions. Such a high degree of variability suggests the need to establish consensus criteria that can be reliably applied across clinical and research settings.
© 2013, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2013, The American Geriatrics Society.
References
-
- Gallagher D, Visser M, Sepulveda D et al. How useful is body mass index for comparison of body fatness across age, sex, and ethnic groups? Am J Epidemiol 1996;143:228-239.
-
- Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing 2010;39:412-423.
-
- Flegal KM, Carroll MD, Kit BK et al. Prevalence of obesity and trends in the distribution of body mass index among US adults, 1999-2010. JAMA 2012;307:491-497.
-
- Gregg EW, Cheng YJ, Cadwell BL et al. Secular trends in cardiovascular disease risk factors according to body mass index in US adults. JAMA 2005;293:1868-1874.
-
- Chambers BA, Guo SS, Siervogel R et al. Cumulative effects of cardiovascular disease risk factors on quality of life. J Nutr Health Aging 2002;6:179-184.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
