Initial validity and reliability of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument
- PMID: 23649006
- DOI: 10.1177/0363546513487981
Initial validity and reliability of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument
Abstract
Background: Patellofemoral instability is a well-recognized problem, but there are currently no published patient-reported quality of life outcome measures that are disease specific for the treatment of this population.
Purpose: To establish the content validity, initial construct validity, and initial reliability of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII).
Study design: Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.
Methods: The content of the BPII was validated using a modified 3-stage Ebel procedure and analysis of floor and ceiling effects. As a measure of internal consistency, the Cronbach α was utilized to assess how reliably the 32 items of the questionnaire measured a similar construct. Test-retest reliability of the BPII was calculated using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct validity was evaluated on 150 questionnaires completed by patients with a confirmed diagnosis of patellofemoral instability. A one-way between-group analysis of variance was employed to determine if the BPII was able to differentiate between patients presenting at the initial orthopaedic consultation relative to patients presenting at 6 months and 12 months postoperatively.
Results: Content validity was clearly established as each item in the BPII achieved a minimum of 83.3% agreement (range, 83.3%-100%) for relevance among the expert panelists. The average agreement was 96.9%; 24 items achieved 100% agreement. There was no evidence of floor or ceiling effects. Reliability (internal consistency) of the BPII was established at the initial orthopaedic consultation (α = .91), 6 months postoperatively (α = .97), and 12 months postoperatively (α = .97). Test-retest analysis resulted in an ICC of 0.98 between tests. Construct validity was established as there was a statistically significant difference in BPII scores at the initial orthopaedic consultation and 6-month and 12-month postoperative appointments (F2,146 = 75.62; P < .001).
Conclusion: The BPII demonstrates content validity, strong initial reliability, and a statistically significant level of construct validity in patients with patellofemoral instability. This population includes patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability as well as surgically stabilized patients.
Keywords: outcome measure; patellofemoral instability; quality of life; reliability; validity.
Similar articles
-
Factor Analysis and Item Reduction of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII): Introduction of BPII 2.0.Am J Sports Med. 2016 Aug;44(8):2081-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546516644605. Epub 2016 May 10. Am J Sports Med. 2016. PMID: 27166290
-
Validity and Reliability of the Banff Patellofemoral Instability Instrument 2.0 in an Adolescent Population.J Pediatr Orthop. 2020 Feb;40(2):e103-e108. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001407. J Pediatr Orthop. 2020. PMID: 31145182
-
Validity, Reliability, and Responsiveness of the Banff Patellar Instability Instrument (BPII) in a Adolescent Population.J Pediatr Orthop. 2018 Nov/Dec;38(10):e629-e633. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001250. J Pediatr Orthop. 2018. PMID: 30199460
-
Outcomes and patient-based hearing status in conductive hearing loss.Laryngoscope. 2001 Nov;111(11 Pt 2 Suppl 98):1-21. doi: 10.1002/lary.5541111401. Laryngoscope. 2001. PMID: 11802001 Review.
-
Reliability of the Dutch translation of the Kujala Patellofemoral Score Questionnaire.Physiother Res Int. 2017 Jan;22(1). doi: 10.1002/pri.1649. Epub 2015 Aug 26. Physiother Res Int. 2017. PMID: 26308151 Review.
Cited by
-
Portuguese Translation and Cross-Cultural Adaption of the Banff Patella Instability Instrument.Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021 Jun 21;56(6):747-760. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1721840. eCollection 2021 Dec. Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo). 2021. PMID: 34900103 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical Outcomes After the Nonoperative Management of Lateral Patellar Dislocations: A Systematic Review.Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Jun 11;6(6):2325967118766275. doi: 10.1177/2325967118766275. eCollection 2018 Jun. Orthop J Sports Med. 2018. PMID: 29942814 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Reliability and Validity of the Arabic Translated Version of the Norwich Patellar Instability Score and the Banff Patellar Instability Instrument 2.0.Orthop J Sports Med. 2025 Jun 5;13(6):23259671251340989. doi: 10.1177/23259671251340989. eCollection 2025 Jun. Orthop J Sports Med. 2025. PMID: 40485877 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship between Anatomical Risk Factors, Articular Cartilage Lesions, and Patient Outcomes Following Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction.Cartilage. 2021 Dec;13(1_suppl):993S-1001S. doi: 10.1177/1947603519894728. Epub 2019 Dec 26. Cartilage. 2021. PMID: 31876167 Free PMC article.
-
Comparable outcome for autografts and allografts in primary medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for patellofemoral instability: systematic review and meta-analysis.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Apr;30(4):1282-1291. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06569-w. Epub 2021 Apr 16. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022. PMID: 33861358 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous