Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Dec;27(6):931-4.
doi: 10.1007/s00540-013-1626-4. Epub 2013 May 7.

Current prevention practice for venous thromboembolism in Japanese intensive care units

Affiliations

Current prevention practice for venous thromboembolism in Japanese intensive care units

Takeshi Yamamoto et al. J Anesth. 2013 Dec.

Abstract

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-recognized life-threatening complication in the intensive care unit (ICU). However, no data have been reported regarding the prevalence and methods of prevention of VTE in Japanese ICUs. This study aimed to document the current practice of VTE prevention across a broad sample of medical-surgical ICU patients in Japan. In November 2010, we performed a point-prevalence survey of Japanese ICUs in training facilities for intensive care specialists. We recorded data from five consecutive ICU patients in each facility at any time on the day of the survey. A total of 470 patients were registered in this study. VTE prophylaxis was received by 85.3 % of participants. Of these, 69.8 % received mechanical prophylaxis and 12.5 % received pharmacological methods, with 17.7 % receiving both methods. Analyzing a comparison of the presence or absence of a hospital prevention protocol, the protocol group had higher rates of receiving prophylaxis (88.8 % vs. 80.0 %, P < 0.01) than the no-protocol group. In conclusion, VTE prophylaxis by mechanical methods was the main method in a high number of medical-surgical ICU patients in Japan. The ICUs with a hospital VTE prevention protocol in place performed significantly higher rates of prophylaxis than those without a protocol.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. J Crit Care. 2003 Dec;18(4):228-37 - PubMed
    1. Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 Suppl):e227S-e277S - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jul 9;339(2):80-5 - PubMed
    1. Circ J. 2011;75(5):1258-81 - PubMed
    1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000 Apr;161(4 Pt 1):1109-14 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources