Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2014 Mar;29(2):213-9.
doi: 10.1007/s00380-013-0357-7. Epub 2013 May 7.

The late-phase inflammatory response after drug-eluting stent implantation

Affiliations
Observational Study

The late-phase inflammatory response after drug-eluting stent implantation

Isao Taguchi et al. Heart Vessels. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Recent advances in drug-eluting stent (DES) technology have succeeded in preventing restenosis. In addition to inhibiting smooth muscle cell proliferation, DES greatly inhibits the local inflammatory response in the acute phase after implantation, leading to prevention of restenosis. However, a unique issue in DES implantation is an impairment of reendothelialization, which may result in abnormal wound healing. Consequently, a late-phase inflammatory relapse could appear in the long term after DES implantation. In this study, we measured serum levels of inflammatory markers, including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor-α, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, matrix metalloproteinase-9, and myeloperoxidase, as well as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein at follow-up coronary angiography (mean 9 months) in 54 patients who received DES stenting who did not experience restenosis, and compared them with 51 patients receiving bare-metal stents (BMS) without restenosis. The level of IL-6 was over the measurement threshold (≥2.22 pg/ml) in 12 patients (21 %) in the DES group, but in only 2 patients (4 %) in the BMS group (P = 0.003). IL-8 was significantly higher in the DES group than in the BMS group (4.51 ± 2.40 vs 3.84 ± 1.34 pg/ml, P = 0.015). The levels of other biomarkers were similar between the two groups. DES showed an increase in inflammatory cytokines in the late phase after implantation in comparison with patients who received BMS, suggesting late-stage inflammation. Therefore, the wound-healing response after DES implantation might be different from that after BMS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2003 Jan;10(1):133-9 - PubMed
    1. JAMA. 2001 Nov 7;286(17):2107-13 - PubMed
    1. Cardiovasc Pathol. 2012 Mar-Apr;21(2):e19-22 - PubMed
    1. Coron Artery Dis. 2013 Aug;24(5):368-73 - PubMed
    1. Circ Res. 1994 Jul;75(1):1-7 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources