Effectiveness of decision support for families, clinicians, or both on HPV vaccine receipt
- PMID: 23650297
- PMCID: PMC3666111
- DOI: 10.1542/peds.2012-3122
Effectiveness of decision support for families, clinicians, or both on HPV vaccine receipt
Abstract
Objective: To improve human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination rates, we studied the effectiveness of targeting automated decision support to families, clinicians, or both.
Methods: Twenty-two primary care practices were cluster-randomized to receive a 3-part clinician-focused intervention (education, electronic health record-based alerts, and audit and feedback) or none. Overall, 22, 486 girls aged 11 to 17 years due for HPV vaccine dose 1, 2, or 3 were randomly assigned within each practice to receive family-focused decision support with educational telephone calls. Randomization established 4 groups: family-focused, clinician-focused, combined, and no intervention. We measured decision support effectiveness by final vaccination rates and time to vaccine receipt, standardized for covariates and limited to those having received the previous dose for HPV #2 and 3. The 1-year study began in May 2010.
Results: Final vaccination rates for HPV #1, 2, and 3 were 16%, 65%, and 63% among controls. The combined intervention increased vaccination rates by 9, 8, and 13 percentage points, respectively. The control group achieved 15% vaccination for HPV #1 and 50% vaccination for HPV #2 and 3 after 318, 178, and 215 days. The combined intervention significantly accelerated vaccination by 151, 68, and 93 days. The clinician-focused intervention was more effective than the family-focused intervention for HPV #1, but less effective for HPV #2 and 3.
Conclusions: A clinician-focused intervention was most effective for initiating the HPV vaccination series, whereas a family-focused intervention promoted completion. Decision support directed at both clinicians and families most effectively promotes HPV vaccine series receipt.
Keywords: decision support systems; electronic records; immunizations.
Figures


Comment in
-
Low Cost Practice Enhancements Improve Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Rates.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014 Sep-Oct;59(5):539-40. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12229_2. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2014. PMID: 26460388 No abstract available.
References
-
- US Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy People 2020. Washington, DC. Available at: www.healthypeople.gov/2020/default.aspx. Accessed June 5, 2012.
-
- Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M, Lawson HW, Chesson H, Unger ER, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) . Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus Vaccine: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2007;56(RR-2):1–24 - PubMed
-
- Broder KR, Cortese MM, Iskander JK, et al. Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) . Preventing tetanus, diphtheria, and pertussis among adolescents: use of tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccines recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006;55(RR-3):1–34 - PubMed
-
- Bilukha OO, Rosenstein N, National Center for Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) . Prevention and control of meningococcal disease. Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005;54(RR-7):1–21 - PubMed
-
- Szilagyi PG, Rand CM, McLaurin J, et al. Working Group on Adolescent Vaccination in the Medical Home . Delivering adolescent vaccinations in the medical home: a new era? Pediatrics. 2008;121(suppl 1):S15–S24 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical