Real-life compliance and persistence among users of subcutaneous and sublingual allergen immunotherapy
- PMID: 23651609
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.03.013
Real-life compliance and persistence among users of subcutaneous and sublingual allergen immunotherapy
Abstract
Background: Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual allergen immunotherapy (SLIT) are safe and effective treatments of allergic rhinitis, but high levels of compliance and persistence are crucial to achieving the desired clinical effects.
Objective: Our objective was to assess levels and predictors of compliance and persistence among grass pollen, tree pollen, and house dust mite immunotherapy users in real life and to estimate the costs of premature discontinuation.
Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a community pharmacy database from The Netherlands containing data from 6486 patients starting immunotherapy for 1 or more of the allergens of interest between 1994 and 2009. Two thousand seven hundred ninety-six patients received SCIT, and 3690 received SLIT. Time to treatment discontinuation was analyzed and included Cox proportional hazard models with time-dependent covariates, where appropriate.
Results: Overall, only 18% of users reached the minimally required duration of treatment of 3 years (SCIT, 23%; SLIT, 7%). Median durations for SCIT and SLIT users were 1.7 and 0.6 years, respectively (P < .001). Other independent predictors of premature discontinuation were prescriber, with patients of general practitioners demonstrating longer persistence than those of allergologists and other medical specialists; single-allergen immunotherapy, lower socioeconomic status; and younger age. Of the persistent patients, 56% were never late in picking up their medication from the pharmacy. Direct medication costs per nonpersistent patient discontinuing in the third year of treatment were €3800, an amount that was largely misspent.
Conclusion: Real-life persistence is better in SCIT users than in SLIT users, although it is low overall. There is an urgent need for further identification of potential barriers and measures that will enhance persistence and compliance.
Keywords: Allergic rhinitis; GP; Grass pollen; HDM; HR; Hazard rate; House dust mite; SCIT; SES; SLIT; Socioeconomic status; Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy; Sublingual allergen immunotherapy; TP; Tree pollen; WHO; World Health Organization; adherence; compliance; cost; persistence; specific allergen immunotherapy; subcutaneous; subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy; sublingual; sublingual allergen immunotherapy.
Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Economic evaluation of sublingual vs subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy.Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 May;100(5):482-9. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)60475-9. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008. PMID: 18517082 Clinical Trial.
-
An evidence-based analysis of house dust mite allergen immunotherapy: a call for more rigorous clinical studies.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013 Dec;132(6):1322-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.09.004. Epub 2013 Oct 18. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013. PMID: 24139829 Review.
-
Efficacy of subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy with grass allergens for seasonal allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis-based comparison.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Nov;130(5):1097-1107.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.08.012. Epub 2012 Sep 27. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012. PMID: 23021885
-
Evaluation of serum IgG4 antibodies specific to grass pollen allergen components in the follow up of allergic patients undergoing subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy.Vaccine. 2007 Jan 15;25(5):957-64. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.08.040. Epub 2006 Sep 11. Vaccine. 2007. PMID: 17045368
-
House Dust Mite Sublingual Immunotherapy for Pediatric Patients With Allergic Asthma.Ann Pharmacother. 2018 Oct;52(10):1019-1030. doi: 10.1177/1060028018769443. Epub 2018 Apr 11. Ann Pharmacother. 2018. PMID: 29642713 Review.
Cited by
-
Mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy and immune tolerance to allergens.World Allergy Organ J. 2015 May 14;8(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40413-015-0063-2. eCollection 2015. World Allergy Organ J. 2015. PMID: 26023323 Free PMC article.
-
From Allergen Molecules to Molecular Immunotherapy of Nut Allergy: A Hard Nut to Crack.Front Immunol. 2021 Sep 23;12:742732. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.742732. eCollection 2021. Front Immunol. 2021. PMID: 34630424 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An accelerated dose escalation with a grass pollen allergoid is safe and well-tolerated: a randomized open label phase II trial.Clin Transl Allergy. 2016 Feb 2;6:4. doi: 10.1186/s13601-016-0093-z. eCollection 2015. Clin Transl Allergy. 2016. PMID: 26839682 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of the immunogenicity of BM32, a recombinant hypoallergenic B cell epitope-based grass pollen allergy vaccine with allergen extract-based vaccines.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Nov;140(5):1433-1436.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.03.048. Epub 2017 May 31. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017. PMID: 28576673 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Peptide Immunotherapy; short but long lasting?Curr Treat Options Allergy. 2015;2(1):64-71. doi: 10.1007/s40521-014-0043-8. Epub 2015 Feb 3. Curr Treat Options Allergy. 2015. PMID: 32953388 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources