Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;22(1):12-7.
doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2013.90. Epub 2013 May 8.

A framework to start the debate on neonatal screening policies in the EU: an Expert Opinion Document

Affiliations

A framework to start the debate on neonatal screening policies in the EU: an Expert Opinion Document

Martina C Cornel et al. Eur J Hum Genet. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

The European Union (EU) Council Recommendation on rare diseases urged the member states to implement national and EU collaborative actions to improve the health care of rare disease patients. Following this recommendation, the European Commission launched a tender on newborn screening (NBS) to report on current practices of laboratory testing, form a network of experts and provide guidance on how to further implement NBS screening in a responsible way, the latter of which was provided in an Expert Opinion document. After consultation of experts from EU member states, (potential) candidate member states and European Free Trade Association countries, in a consensus meeting in June 2011, 70 expert opinions were finalized. They included the need to develop case definitions for all disorders screened for to facilitate assessment and international outcome studies. Decision whether a screening program should be performed can be based on screening criteria updated from the traditional Wilson and Jungner (1968) criteria, relating to disease, treatment, test and cost. The interest of the child should be central in the assessment of pros and cons. A European NBS body should assess evidence on (new) screening candidate disorders. For rare conditions, best level evidence should be used. The health system should ensure treatment to cases diagnosed by screening, controlled and revised by follow-up outcome studies. Screening methodology should aim to avoid unintended findings, such as mild forms and carrier status information, as much as possible. Activities to improve NBS in Europe, such as training and scientific evaluation, could benefit from collaboration at EU level and beyond.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wilson JMG, Jungner G.Principles and Practice of Screening for Disease. Geneva: WHO, 1968. Available from http://whqlibdoc.who.int/php/WHO_PHP_34.pdf .
    1. Council Recommendation of 8 June 2009 on an action in the field of rare diseases. Available from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2009:151:0007... .
    1. Loeber JG, Burgard B, Cornel MC, et al. Newborn screening programmes in Europe; arguments and efforts regarding harmonization. Part 1 - from blood spot to screening result. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2012;35:603–611. - PubMed
    1. Burgard P, Rupp K, Lindner M, et al. Newborn screening programmes in Europe; arguments and efforts regarding harmonization. Part 2 - from screening laboratory results to treatment, follow-up and quality assurance. J Inherit Metab Dis. 2012;35:613–625. - PubMed
    1. Kristensen FB, Mäkelä M, Neikter SA, European network for Health Technology Assessment (EUnetHTA) et al. European network for health technology assessment, EUnetHTA: planning, development, and implementation of a sustainable European network for health technology assessment. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009;25 (Suppl 2:107–116. - PubMed

Publication types