Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 May;12(5):519-36.
doi: 10.1586/erv.13.35.

Immunological assessment of influenza vaccines and immune correlates of protection

Affiliations
Review

Immunological assessment of influenza vaccines and immune correlates of protection

Adrian Reber et al. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2013 May.

Abstract

Influenza vaccines remain the primary public health tool in reducing the ever-present burden of influenza and its complications. In seeking more immunogenic, more effective and more broadly cross-protective influenza vaccines, the landscape of influenza vaccines is rapidly expanding, both in near-term advances and next-generation vaccine design. Although the first influenza vaccines were licensed over 60 years ago, the hemagglutination-inhibition antibody titer is currently the only universally accepted immune correlate of protection against influenza. However, hemagglutination-inhibition titers appear to be less effective at predicting protection in populations at high risk for severe influenza disease; older adults, young children and those with certain medical conditions. The lack of knowledge and validated methods to measure alternate immune markers of protection against influenza remain a substantial barrier to the development of more immunogenic, broadly cross-reactive and effective influenza vaccines. Here, the authors review the knowledge of immune effectors of protection against influenza and discuss assessment methods for a broader range of immunological parameters that could be considered in the evaluation of traditional or new-generation influenza vaccines.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Assessment of immune responses to influenza.
(A) Antibody titers measured by the hemagglutination-inhibition assay are the gold-standard immune marker correlated with protection against influenza. However, there are limitations to the generalizability of the currently accepted hemagglutination-inhibition titer criteria, particularly in populations at high risk for severe influenza disease, and for the assessment of nontraditional influenza vaccines. Single radial hemolysis is also a recognized correlate of protection for influenza and is used by the EU for vaccine licensure. (B) A variety of serological assays are currently used to assess antibodies; some of these have the potential to identify alternative correlates of protection for both traditional and nontraditional influenza vaccines. Virus neutralization assays are becoming more widely used, but standardized methods and criteria for evaluation of titers associated with protection are lacking. Standardized assays that detect responses to M2 and neuraminidase are also needed. (C) T cells target viral epitopes primarily derived from internal proteins that have been shown to be highly conserved across viral strains. While assays assessing cell-mediated immune responses to influenza vaccination are becoming more commonplace, identification of key, qualified assays are needed to develop cellular immune markers that may correlate with protection against influenza. ELISpot: Enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barr IG, McCauley J, Cox N et al. Epidemiological, antigenic and genetic characteristics of seasonal influenza A(H1N1), A(H3N2) and B influenza viruses: basis for the WHO recommendation on the composition of influenza vaccines for use in the 2009–2010 Northern Hemisphere season. Vaccine 28(5), 1156–1167 (2010). - PubMed
    1. Fiore AE, Bridges CB, Cox NJ. Seasonal influenza vaccines. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 333, 43–82 (2009). - PubMed
    1. Johansen K, Nicoll A, Ciancio BC, Kramarz P. Pandemic influenza A(H1N1) 2009 vaccines in the European Union. Euro Surveill. 14(41), 19361 (2009). - PubMed
    1. Calcagnile S, Zuccotti GV. The virosomal adjuvanted influenza vaccine. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 10(2), 191–200 (2010). - PubMed
    1. Sullivan SJ, Jacobson R, Poland GA. Advances in the vaccination of the elderly against influenza: role of a high-dose vaccine. Expert Rev. Vaccines 9(10), 1127–1133 (2010). - PubMed

Websites

    1. US Department of Health and Human Services. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). News and Events: Jan. 16, 2013. www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncements/ucm335891.htm
    1. WHO. WHO Global Influenza Surveillance Network. Manual for the laboratory diagnosis and virological surveillance of influenza. www.who.int/influenza/resources/documents/manual_diagnosis_surveillance_...
    1. European Medicines Agency (EMA). Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP). Note for guidance on harmonisation of requirements for influenza vaccines. www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009...
    1. FDA. Guidance for industry: clinical data needed to support the licensure of seasonal inactivated influenza vaccines. www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformati...
    1. EMA. Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP).Guideline on dossier structure and content for pandemic influenza vaccine marketing authorisation application. www.emea.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009...

Publication types

MeSH terms