Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Jun;15(6):439-48.
doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00617.x. Epub 2012 Dec 2.

Evaluation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system for patients undergoing curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for the development of a refined staging system

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system for patients undergoing curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for the development of a refined staging system

Albert C Y Chan et al. HPB (Oxford). 2013 Jun.

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system and to compare its efficacy with those of the fifth and sixth editions of the AJCC staging system and the TNM staging system defined by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan.

Methods: Data for 754 patients submitted to hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between 1989 and 2005 were reviewed. Tumour-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between subgroups using the log-rank test. Prognostic factors for tumour-free survival were identified by multivariable analysis. The accuracy of these staging systems was evaluated using the Cox regression model and a refined staging system was developed based on the drawbacks of the respective systems.

Results: According to the criteria defined by the seventh AJCC TNM staging system, 5-year survival was 50.6% in patients with T1 tumours, 21.0% in patients with T2 tumours, 14.6% in patients with T3a tumours, 12.1% in patients with T3b tumours, and 12.9% in patients with T4 tumours. There was no survival difference between patients with T3a and T3b tumours (P = 0.073), nor between those with T3b and T4 tumours (P = 0.227). Significant prognostic tumour factors were microvascular invasion, tumour multiplicity, bilobar disease and a tumour size of ≥5.0 cm. The fifth and sixth editions of the AJCC TNM staging system were found to be more accurate in prognosis than the seventh.

Conclusions: The seventh edition of the AJCC TNM staging system is able to adequately stratify patients with early HCC only. A refined staging system is therefore proposed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Disease-free survival in the study cohort (n = 754) according to the fifth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumour–node–metastasis (TNM) staging system
Figure 2
Figure 2
Disease-free survival in the study cohort (n = 754) according to the sixth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumour–node–metastasis (TNM) staging system
Figure 3
Figure 3
Disease-free survival in the study cohort (n = 754) according to the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumour–node–metastasis (TNM) staging system
Figure 4
Figure 4
Impact of tumour size on disease-free survival in patients with solitary tumours without microvascular invasion
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison of survival among patients with a solitary tumour of >5.0 cm with microvascular invasion (A; n = 146), unilobar multiple tumours without microvascular invasion (B; n = 53), and unilobar multiple tumours with microvascular invasion (C; n = 82)
Figure 6
Figure 6
Disease-free survival in the study cohort (n = 754) under the refined T-staging system

References

    1. Bosch FX, Ribes J, Borras J. Epidemiology of primary liver cancer. Semin Liver Dis. 1999;19:271–285. - PubMed
    1. Sherman M. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors, and screening. Semin Liver Dis. 2005;25:143–154. - PubMed
    1. Nordenstedt H, White DL, El-Serag HB. The changing pattern of epidemiology in hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Liver Dis. 2010;42(Suppl. 3):206–214. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Poon RT, Ng IO, Fan ST, Lai EC, Lo CM, Liu CL, et al. Clinicopathologic features of longterm survivors and disease-free survivors after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a study of a prospective cohort. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3037–3044. - PubMed
    1. Kaibori M, Ishizaki M, Saito T, Matsui K, Kwon AH, Kamiyama Y. Risk factors and outcome of early recurrence after resection of small hepatocellular carcinomas. Am J Surg. 2009;198:39–45. - PubMed

MeSH terms