[A random control study of indomethacin-containing MYCu intrauterine contraceptive device for 60 months]
- PMID: 23660315
[A random control study of indomethacin-containing MYCu intrauterine contraceptive device for 60 months]
Abstract
Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy and safety of MYCu intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) containing indomethacin.
Methods: From October 1 to December 31, 2004, women of child-bearing age requiring IUD for contraception were chosen from the Outpatient Departments of China-Japan Friendship Hospital of Jilin University, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University Third Hospital, Jilin University Second Hospital and Affiliated Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University. They were randomly inserted with MYCuIUD and control TCu380A IUD each for 1000 cases and followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post-insertion.
Results: When MYCu IUD group and TCu380A group 60 months post-insertion were compared, the cumulative pregnancy rates with IUD in situ were 2.38/100 women per year and 2.84/100 women per year respectively. And the difference had no statistical significance (P > 0.05); the cumulative expulsion rates, mostly of partial expulsion and downward movement, were 0.87/100 women per year and 2.94/100 women per year respectively. And the difference had statistical significance (P < 0.05); the cumulative termination rates due to bleeding/pain were 3.57/100 women per year and 4.83/100 women per year respectively. And the difference had no statistical significance (P > 0.05); Side effects in MYCu group were less pronounced than those in TCu group. And the inter-group differences had statistical significance (P < 0.05).
Conclusion: As a comparatively ideal medicated medical device, MYCu IUD has an excellent contraceptive efficacy, a low rate of expulsion and side effects and good reversibility. Particularly a low occurrence rate of bleeding and pain during early insertion is recommended. Its life expectancy is 15 years. And its contraceptive effectiveness and safety after 5 years should be examined during further follow-ups.
Similar articles
-
Performances of copper T 380A and multiload copper 375/250 intrauterine contraceptive devices in a comparative clinical trial.Afr J Med Med Sci. 1995 Mar;24(1):59-65. Afr J Med Med Sci. 1995. PMID: 7495202 Clinical Trial.
-
[Medicated stainless steel ring-165, medicated gamma-intrauterine devices and TCu220C: a multicenter comparative study].Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1997 Feb;32(2):97-101. Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 1997. PMID: 9596880 Clinical Trial. Chinese.
-
Intrauterine devices: an effective alternative to oral hormonal contraception.Prescrire Int. 2009 Jun;18(101):125-30. Prescrire Int. 2009. PMID: 19637436
-
Intrauterine devices. The optimal long-term contraceptive method?J Reprod Med. 1999 Mar;44(3):269-74. J Reprod Med. 1999. PMID: 10202746 Review.
-
Intrauterine contraception.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Aug;4(4):527-30. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 1992. PMID: 1324024 Review.
Cited by
-
Hormonal and intrauterine methods for contraception for women aged 25 years and younger.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Aug 17;2015(8):CD009805. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009805.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26280888 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions to prevent or treat heavy menstrual bleeding or pain associated with intrauterine-device use.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 26;8(8):CD006034. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006034.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36017945 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials