Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;20(10):6778-93.
doi: 10.1007/s11356-012-1295-0. Epub 2013 May 11.

Microarray testing for the presence of toxic algae monitoring programme in Galicia (NW Spain)

Affiliations

Microarray testing for the presence of toxic algae monitoring programme in Galicia (NW Spain)

Simon M Dittami et al. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Rapid and reliable detection of harmful algae in coastal areas and shellfish farms is an important requirement of monitoring programmes. Monitoring of toxic algae by means of traditional methods, i.e., light microscopy, can be time consuming when many samples have to be routinely analysed. Reliable species identification requires expensive equipment and trained personnel to carry out the analyses. However, all techniques for the monitoring of harmful algae usually require transportation of samples to specialised laboratories. In many monitoring laboratories, results are usually obtained within five working days after receiving the sample and therefore preventative measures are not always possible. Molecular technologies are rapidly improving the detection of phytoplankton and their toxins and the speed at which the results can be obtained. Assays are based on the discrimination of the genetic differences of the different species and species-specific probes can be designed. Such probes have been adapted to a microarray or phylochip format and assessed in several EU monitoring sites. Microarray results are presented for 1 year of field samples validated with cell counts from concentrated samples taken during toxic events from the weekly sampling of the Galician Monitoring Programme done by INTECMAR. The Galician monitoring laboratory does their own counting and their results are posted on their web site within 24 h. There was good correlation between cells present and microarray signals. In the few cases of false negatives, these can be attributed to poor RNA extraction of the target species, viz. Prorocentrum or Dinophysis. Where potential false positives were encountered, the smaller volume taken for cell counts as compared to the upto 300 times more volume taken for RNA extraction for the microarray is likely the cause for these differences, making the microarray more sensitive. The microarray was able to provide better species resolution in Alexandrium and Pseudo-nitzschia. In all cases, the toxins recovered by the toxin array were matched by target species in the array or in the cell counts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Feb 25;32(4):1363-71 - PubMed
    1. J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2000 Jan-Feb;47(1):76-84 - PubMed
    1. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2013 Oct;20(10):6808-15 - PubMed
    1. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2005 Apr 15;245(2):271-8 - PubMed
    1. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Mar;69(3):1397-407 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources