Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Jun;16(2):187-212.
doi: 10.1007/s10567-013-0133-3.

Culturally sensitive risk behavior prevention programs for African American adolescents: a systematic analysis

Affiliations
Review

Culturally sensitive risk behavior prevention programs for African American adolescents: a systematic analysis

Isha Metzger et al. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2013 Jun.

Abstract

The current review conducted a systematic assessment of culturally sensitive risk prevention programs for African American adolescents. Prevention programs meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were evaluated across several domains: (1) theoretical orientation and foundation; (2) methodological rigor; (3) level of cultural integration; (4) program target or domain (e.g., schools, communities, families); (5) outcome change level assessed (e.g., addressing change in beliefs/values or behaviors); and (6) program effects on risk behaviors. Thirteen studies (N = 13) with adolescent participants ranging from 10 to 18 years were identified and evaluated. Analyses suggested that more effective culturally sensitive risk prevention programs included the following: (1) a clearly articulated theoretical orientation, which utilized both universal (e.g., behavioral theories) and culturally specific (e.g., Africultural theories) frameworks; (2) a rigorous methodological design (e.g., inclusion of control group, utilization of program manuals, valid and reliable study measures); (3) an integration of culture at multiple levels (e.g., accessibility, delivery, and content) of programming; (4) consideration of the influence of multiple contexts and domains (e.g., family, community, school); (5) multiple behavior change outcomes (e.g., behaviors, relationships, values); and (6) sustained program effects over time. Recommendations for increasing the effectiveness and efficacy of culturally sensitive prevention programs are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fam Community Health. 2007 Jan-Mar;30(1):29-41 - PubMed
    1. Prev Sci. 2002 Sep;3(3):241-6 - PubMed
    1. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Oct;72(5):870-8 - PubMed
    1. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2011 Jul;39(5):711-9 - PubMed
    1. J Adolesc Health. 2002 Oct;31(4):354-62 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources