Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2012 Dec;46(4):189-99.

Challenges in provider payment under the Ghana National Health Insurance Scheme: a case study of claims management in two districts

Affiliations

Challenges in provider payment under the Ghana National Health Insurance Scheme: a case study of claims management in two districts

S Sodzi-Tettey et al. Ghana Med J. 2012 Dec.

Abstract

In 2004, Ghana started implementing a National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS) to remove cost as a barrier to quality healthcare. Providers were initially paid by fee - for - service. In May 2008, this changed to paying providers by a combination of Ghana - Diagnostic Related Groupings (G-DRGs) for services and fee - for - service for medicines through the claims process.

Objective: The study evaluated the claims management processes for two District MHIS in the Upper East Region of Ghana.

Methods: Retrospective review of secondary claims data (2008) and a prospective observation of claims management (2009) were undertaken. Qualitative and quantitative approaches were used for primary data collection using interview guides and checklists. The reimbursements rates and value of rejected claims were calculated and compared for both districts using the z test. The null hypothesis was that no differences existed in parameters measured.

Findings: Claims processes in both districts were similar and predominantly manual. There were administrative capacity, technical, human resource and working environment challenges contributing to delays in claims submission by providers and vetting and payment by schemes. Both Schemes rejected less than 1% of all claims submitted. Significant differences were observed between the Total Reimbursement Rates (TRR) and the Total Timely Reimbursement Rates (TTRR) for both schemes. For TRR, 89% and 86% were recorded for Kassena Nankana and Builsa Schemes respectively while for TTRR, 45% and 28% were recorded respectively.

Conclusion: Ghana's NHIS needs to reform its provider payment and claims submission and processing systems to ensure simpler and faster processes. Computerization and investment to improve the capacity to administer for both purchasers and providers will be key in any reform.

Keywords: claims management; claims process; claims rejection; health insurance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest: None declared

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart on NHIS Claims process
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean reimbursement monthly rate by districts (GH¢)
Figure 3
Figure 3
monthly mean cost proportions of rejected claims

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Agyepong I, Adjei S. Public Social Policy Development and Implementation: A case study of the Ghana National Health Insurance Scheme. Health Policy and Planning. 2008;23:150–160. - PubMed
    1. Government of Ghana, author. Act 650. Accra, Ghana, NHIA: NHIS Policy Framework for Ghana; 2004. National Health Insurance Act 2003.
    1. Jehu-Appiah C, Aryeetey G, Spaan E, de Hoop T, Agyepong I, Baltussen R. Equity aspects of the National Health Insurance Scheme in Ghana: Who is enrolling, who is not and why? Social Science & Medicine. 2011;72:157–165. - PubMed
    1. Kutzin J. A descriptive framework for country-level analysis of health care financing arrangements. Health Policy. 2001;56:171–204. 56. - PubMed
    1. NHIA, author. NHIS Tariff and Benefits package manual. 2008.

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources