Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jan;30(1):27-32.
doi: 10.4103/0970-9371.107509.

Clinico-radiological and pathological evaluation of extra testicular scrotal lesions

Affiliations

Clinico-radiological and pathological evaluation of extra testicular scrotal lesions

Suparna Mukherjee et al. J Cytol. 2013 Jan.

Abstract

Background: Scrotal ultrasound, though reliable in distinguishing between intratesticular and extratesticular lesions and characterizing them as cystic and solid, cannot distinguish benign from malignant pathology. Although fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has proved to be of great diagnostic importance in testicular lesions, its scope in extratesticular lesions is largely unexplored.

Aim: To evaluate extratesticular scrotal lesions cytologically and compare it with their clinical, radiological, and histological findings.

Materials and methods: Sixty five patients with extratesticular scrotal lesions were assessed clinically, radiologically, and cytologically. Histopathology was done in 45 cases where surgical exploration was undertaken. All the data were then analyzed and correlated.

Results: Extratesticular lesions accounted for 72.2% of the scrotal swellings. Of these, the epididymis is most commonly involved (61.5% cases) with the commonest type of lesion being cystic (49.3% cases). Ultrasonography preferably with color doppler is highly useful for the evaluation of the scrotum. Apart from distinguishing extratesticular from testicular and cystic from solid lesions, it has an important role in identifying individual lesions, thus reducing the list of differential diagnosis. Fine needle aspiration cytology contributed to a definitive diagnosis in 47.7% cases. It helps classify cystic masses on the basis of their contents and defines the etiology of chronic inflammatory lesions, apart from corroborating with the clinico-radiological diagnosis. Histological evaluation was possible only in cases where surgery was performed and helps further define the diagnosis.

Conclusion: Fine needle aspiration cytology is essentially non-traumatic and easy to carry out and should be a technique of choice for the study of scrotal pathology, main advantage being avoidance of delays in diagnosis.

Keywords: Cytology; epididymis; extratesticular; scrotum; ultrasound.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Epididymal cyst/spermatocele. Anechoic cyst in the head of epididymis; (b) Spermatocele. Smear shows dense population of dispersed sperm, other spermatogenic cells and histiocytes (H and E, ×500); (c) Tuberculous epididymo-orchitis. Smear shows clusters of epithelioid cells and lymphocytes in a background of neutrophils (H and E, ×500); (d) Elephantiasis. Smear shows single intact microfilaria against a background of inflammatory cells and cellular debris (Pap, ×500)
Figure 2
Figure 2
Late post-vasectomy syndrome. Smear shows sperm granuloma around a tubule showing two multinucleated giant cells, epithelioid cells, inflammatory cells and histiocytes (H and E, ×250)
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) Fibrous pseudotumor (gross). Cut section of tumor is pale homogenous and attached to capsule of testis; (b) Fibrous pseudotumor – Section shows fascicles of spindle-shaped cells with few inflammatory cells (H and E, ×250)
Figure 4
Figure 4
(a) Scrotal calcinosis – Multinodular, large, yellowish swellings on scrotum; (b) Scrotal calcinosis – Smear shows calcium deposits and few degenerating cells (H and E, ×500); (c) Scrotal calcinosis – Section shows intradermal basophilic calcific masses, with overlying epidermis (H and E, ×50)

References

    1. Frates MC, Benson CB, Di Salvo DN, Brown DL, Laing FC, Doudilet PM. Solid extratesticular masses evaluated with sonography: Pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1997;204:43–6. - PubMed
    1. Aragona F, Pescatori E, Talenti E, Tomà P, Malena S, Glazel GP. Painless scrotal masses in the pediatric population: Prevalence and age distribution of different pathological conditions - A 10 year retrospective multicenter study. J Urol. 1996;155:1424–6. - PubMed
    1. Tewari R, Mishra MN, Salopal TK. The role of fine needle aspiration cytology in evaluation of epididymal nodular lesions. Acta Cytol. 2007;51:168–70. - PubMed
    1. Shah VB, Shet TM, Lad SK. Fine needle aspiration cytology of epididymal nodules. J Cytol. 2011;28:103–7. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rholl KS, Lee JK, Ling D, Heiken JP, Glazer HS. MR imaging of the scrotum with a high-resolution surface coil. Radiology. 1987;163:99–103. - PubMed