Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2013 Apr 11;42(1):28.
doi: 10.1186/1916-0216-42-28.

The impact of clinical versus pathological staging in oral cavity carcinoma--a multi-institutional analysis of survival

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The impact of clinical versus pathological staging in oral cavity carcinoma--a multi-institutional analysis of survival

Vincent L Biron et al. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. .

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate any disparity in clinical versus pathological TNM staging in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) patients and any impact of this on survival.

Design: Demographic, survival, staging, and pathologic data on all patients undergoing surgical treatment for OCSCC in Alberta between 1998 and 2006 was collected. Clinical and pathological TNM staging data were compared. Patients were stratified as pathologically downstaged, upstaged or unchanged.

Setting: Tertiary care centers in Alberta, Canada.

Main outcome measures: Survival differences between groups were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models.

Results: Patients with clinically early stage tumors were pathologically upstaged in 21.9% of cases and unchanged in 78.1% of cases. Patients with clinically advanced stage tumors were pathologically downstaged in 7.9% of cases and unchanged in 92.1% of cases. Univariate and multivariate estimates of disease-specific survival showed no statistically significant differences in survival when patients were either upstaged or downstaged.

Conclusions: Some disparity exists in clinical versus pathological staging in OCSCC, however, this does not have any significant impact on disease specific survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Upstaging and downstaging in early vs late stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma in 379 patients.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan-Meir estimates of disease-specific survival according to stage discrepancy. Blue, early stage patients with no change. Green, early stage patients upstaged to advanced stage. Purple, advanced stage patients with no change. Gold, advanced stage patients downstaged to early stage.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Shariat SF, Palapattu GS, Karakiewicz PI. Discrepancy between clinical and pathologic stage: impact on prognosis after radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2007;51(1):137–149. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.05.021. discussion 149–51. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ross GL, Soutar DS, MacDonald DG. Improved staging of cervical metastases in clinically node-negative patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(2):213–218. doi: 10.1245/ASO.2004.03.057. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Greenberg JS, Naggar El AK, Mo V, Roberts D, Myers JN. Disparity in pathologic and clinical lymph node staging in oral tongue carcinoma. Implication for therapeutic decision making. Cancer. 2003;98(3):508–515. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11526. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferris RL, Xi L, Raja S. Molecular staging of cervical lymph nodes in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Res. 2005;65(6):2147–2156. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3717. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guillemaud JP, Patel RS, Goldstein DP, Higgins KM, Enepekides DJ. Prognostic impact of intraoperative microscopic cut-through on frozen section in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;39(4):370–377. - PubMed