Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2013 Jul;6(7):785-94.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.11.022. Epub 2013 May 8.

Stress CMR reduces revascularization, hospital readmission, and recurrent cardiac testing in intermediate-risk patients with acute chest pain

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Stress CMR reduces revascularization, hospital readmission, and recurrent cardiac testing in intermediate-risk patients with acute chest pain

Chadwick D Miller et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in an observation unit (OU) on revascularization, hospital readmission, and recurrent cardiac testing in intermediate-risk patients with possible acute coronary syndromes (ACS).

Background: Intermediate-risk patients commonly undergo hospital admission with high rates of coronary revascularization. It is unknown whether OU-based care with CMR is a more efficient alternative.

Methods: A total of 105 intermediate-risk participants with symptoms of ACS but without definite ACS on the basis of the first electrocardiogram and troponin were randomized to usual care provided by cardiologists and internists (n = 53) or to OU care with stress CMR (n = 52). The primary composite endpoint of coronary artery revascularization, hospital readmission, and recurrent cardiac testing at 90 days was determined. The secondary endpoint was length of stay from randomization to index visit discharge; safety was measured as ACS after discharge.

Results: The median age of participants was 56 years (range 35 to 91 years), 54% were men, and 20% had pre-existing coronary disease. Index hospital admission was avoided in 85% of the OU CMR participants. The primary outcome occurred in 20 usual care participants (38%) versus 7 OU CMR participants (13%) (hazard ratio: 3.4; 95% confidence interval: 1.4 to 8.0, p = 0.006). The OU CMR group experienced significant reductions in all components: revascularizations (15% vs. 2%, p = 0.03), hospital readmissions (23% vs. 8%, p = 0.03), and recurrent cardiac testing (17% vs. 4%, p = 0.03). Median length of stay was 26 h (interquartile range: 23 to 45 h) in the usual care group and 21 h (interquartile range: 15 to 25 h) in the OU CMR group (p < 0.001). ACS after discharge occurred in 3 usual care participants (6%) and no OU CMR participants.

Conclusions: In this single-center trial, management of intermediate-risk patients with possible ACS in an OU with stress CMR reduced coronary artery revascularization, hospital readmissions, and recurrent cardiac testing, without an increase in post-discharge ACS at 90 days. (Randomized Investigation of Chest Pain Diagnostic Strategies; NCT01035047).

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Consort diagram
The study randomized 105 participants to OU-CMR (n=52) or usual care (n=53). All were analyzed based on intent to treat. OU, observation unit; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance; ED, emergency department;
Figure 2
Figure 2. Cumulative incidence curves
Cumulative incidence curves demonstrate an early reduction in composite events that continued through 90 days in the OU-CMR group compared to the usual care group. OU, observation unit; CMR, cardiac magnetic resonance.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cury RC, Shash K, Nagurney JT, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance with T2-weighted imaging improves detection of patients with acute coronary syndrome in the emergency department. Circulation. 2008;118:837–44. - PubMed
    1. Ingkanisorn WP, Kwong RY, Bohme NS, et al. Prognosis of Negative Adenosine Stress Magnetic Resonance in Patients Presenting to an Emergency Department With Chest Pain. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2006;47:1427–1432. - PubMed
    1. Kwong RY, Arai AE. Detecting patients with acute coronary syndrome in the chest pain center of the emergency department with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2004;3:25–31. - PubMed
    1. Miller CD, Hoekstra JW, Lefebvre C, et al. Provider-Directed Imaging Stress Testing Reduces Health Care Expenditures in Lower-Risk Chest Pain Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department/Clinical Perspective. Circulation: Cardiovascular Imaging. 2012;5:111–118. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.111.965293. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller CD, Hwang W, Hoekstra JW, et al. Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Observation Unit Care Reduces Cost for Patients With Emergent Chest Pain: A Randomized Trial. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2010;56:209–219.e2. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data