Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Jul;6(7):762-71.
doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.11.021. Epub 2013 May 8.

Visceral and subcutaneous fat quality and cardiometabolic risk

Affiliations

Visceral and subcutaneous fat quality and cardiometabolic risk

Klara J Rosenquist et al. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013 Jul.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether computed tomography (CT) attenuation, as a measure of fat quality, is associated with cardiometabolic risk factors above and beyond fat quantity.

Background: Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) are pathogenic fat depots associated with cardiometabolic risk. Adipose tissue attenuation in CT images is variable, similar to adipose tissue volume. However, whether the quality of abdominal fat attenuation is associated with cardiometabolic risk independent of the quantity is uncertain.

Methods: Participants were drawn from the Framingham Heart Study CT substudy. The VAT and SAT volumes were acquired by semiquantitative assessment. Fat quality was measured by CT attenuation and recorded as mean Hounsfield unit (HU) within each fat depot. Sex-specific linear and logistic multivariable regression models were used to assess the association between standard deviation (SD) decrease in HU and each risk factor.

Results: Lower CT attenuation of VAT and SAT was correlated with higher body mass index levels in both sexes. Risk factors were generally more adverse with decreasing HU values. For example, in women, per 1 SD decrease in VAT HU, the odds ratio (OR) was increased for hypertension (OR: 1.80), impaired fasting glucose (OR: 2.10), metabolic syndrome (OR: 3.65), and insulin resistance (OR: 3.36; all p < 0.0001). In models that further adjusted for VAT volume, impaired fasting glucose, metabolic syndrome, and insulin resistance remained significant. Trends were similar but less pronounced for SAT and for men. There was evidence of an interaction between HU and fat volume among both women and men.

Conclusions: Lower CT attenuation of VAT and SAT is associated with adverse cardiometabolic risk above and beyond total adipose tissue volume. Qualitative indices of abdominal fat depots may provide insight regarding cardiometabolic risk independent of fat quantity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Visceral and Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue on Computed Tomography
VAT = Visceral Adipose Tissue, SAT = Subcutaneous Adipose Tissue. Computer generated Hounsfield units for VAT was −99.8 and for SAT was −109.4 for this scan.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Associations of HU (fat dens ity) within tertiles of absolute levels of VAT for women (Panel A) and men (Panel B)
In women, the cutpoint between tertile HU 1 and tertile HU 2 was −94.7. The cutpoint between tertile HU 2 and tertile HU 3 was −90.1. In men, the cutpoint between tertile HU 1 and tertile HU 2 was −97.7. The cutpoint between tertile HU 2 and tertile HU 3 was −93.9. VAT1 represented the lowest tertile of VAT volume and VAT3 represented the highest tertile of VAT volume.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McLaughlin T, Lamendola C, Liu A, Abbasi F. Preferential fat deposition in subcutaneous versus visceral depots is associated with insulin sensitivity. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. 2011;96:E1756–E1760. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wildman RP, Muntner P, Reynolds K, McGinn AP, Rajpathak S, Wylie-Rosett J, Sowers MR. The obese without cardiometabolic risk factor clustering and the normal weight with cardiometabolic risk factor clustering: prevalence and correlates of 2 phenotypes among the US population (NHANES 1999–2004) Arch Intern Med. 2008;168:1617–24. - PubMed
    1. Fox CS, Massaro JM, Hoffman U, Pou KM, Maurovich-Horvat P, Liu C-Y, Vasan RS, Murabito JM, Meigs JB, Cupples LA, D’Agostino RB, O’Donnell CJ. Abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments: association with metabolic risk factors in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2007;116:39–48. - PubMed
    1. McLaughlin T, Abbasi F, Lamendola C, Reaven G. Heterogeneity in the prevalence of risk factors for cardiovascular disease and Type 2 diabetes mellitus in obese individuals: effect of differences in insulin sensitivity. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167:642–8. - PubMed
    1. Goodpaster BH, Krishnaswami S, Harris TB, Katsiaras A, Kritchevsky SB, Simonsick EM, Nevitt M, Holvoet P, Newman AB. Obesity, regional body fat distribution, and the metabolic syndrome in older men and women. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165:777–83. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms