Choosing Wisely and the perceived drivers of endoscopy use
- PMID: 23664894
- PMCID: PMC3845025
- DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.05.002
Choosing Wisely and the perceived drivers of endoscopy use
Conflict of interest statement
References
-
- American Board of Internal Medicine Foundation. Choosing Wisely: Five Things Physicians and Patients Should Question. [Accessed March 27, 2013];Website. 2013 Available at: URL: http://www.choosingwisely.org/doctor-patient-lists/american-gastroentero...
-
- Berwick DM, Hackbarth AD. Eliminating waste in US health care. JAMA. 2012 Apr 11;307(14):1513–6. - PubMed
-
- Tilburt JC, Cassel CK. Why the ethics of parsimonious medicine is not the ethics of rationing. JAMA. 2013 Feb 27;309(8):773–4. - PubMed
-
- Kramer JR, Arney J, Chen J, Richardson P, Duan Z, Street RL, Hinojosa-Lindsey M, Naik AD, El-Serag HB. Patient-Centered, comparative effectiveness of esophageal cancer screening: protocol for a comparative effectiveness research study to inform guidelines for evidence-based approach to screening and surveillance endoscopy. BMC Health Services Research. 2012;12:288. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ritchie J, Lewis J, O’Conor G. Qualitative Analysis: Practices, Principles and Process. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, editors. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: Sage; 2003.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
