Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May 9;3(5):e002819.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002819.

Social media use among patients and caregivers: a scoping review

Affiliations

Social media use among patients and caregivers: a scoping review

Michele P Hamm et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To map the state of the existing literature evaluating the use of social media in patient and caregiver populations.

Design: Scoping review.

Data sources: Medline, CENTRAL, ERIC, PubMed, CINAHL Plus Full Text, Academic Search Complete, Alt Health Watch, Health Source, Communication and Mass Media Complete, Web of Knowledge and ProQuest (2000-2012).

Study selection: Studies reporting primary research on the use of social media (collaborative projects, blogs/microblogs, content communities, social networking sites, virtual worlds) by patients or caregivers.

Data extraction: Two reviewers screened studies for eligibility; one reviewer extracted data from relevant studies and a second performed verification for accuracy and completeness on a 10% sample. Data were analysed to describe which social media tools are being used, by whom, for what purpose and how they are being evaluated.

Results: Two hundred eighty-four studies were included. Discussion forums were highly prevalent and constitute 66.6% of the sample. Social networking sites (14.8%) and blogs/microblogs (14.1%) were the next most commonly used tools. The intended purpose of the tool was to facilitate self-care in 77.1% of studies. While there were clusters of studies that focused on similar conditions (eg, lifestyle/weight loss (12.7%), cancer (11.3%)), there were no patterns in the objectives or tools used. A large proportion of the studies were descriptive (42.3%); however, there were also 48 (16.9%) randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Among the RCTs, 35.4% reported statistically significant results favouring the social media intervention being evaluated; however, 72.9% presented positive conclusions regarding the use of social media.

Conclusions: There is an extensive body of literature examining the use of social media in patient and caregiver populations. Much of this work is descriptive; however, with such widespread use, evaluations of effectiveness are required. In studies that have examined effectiveness, positive conclusions are often reported, despite non-significant findings.

Keywords: scoping review; social media.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of included studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Specific social media tools described in included studies.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Word cloud representing the conditions included in the study populations. The size of each term is proportional to its representation in the review.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Authors’ conclusions by statistical significance and sample size among randomised controlled trials. Each bubble represents one study and its size is proportional to the number of individuals evaluated.

References

    1. Hawn C. Take two aspirin and tweet me in the morning: how Twitter, Facebook, and other social media are reshaping health care. Health Affair 2009;28:361–8 - PubMed
    1. Allison M. Can web 2.0 reboot clinical trials? Nat Biotechnol 2009;27:895–902 - PubMed
    1. Bonilla-Warford N. Many social media options exist for optometrists. Optometry 2010;81:613–14 - PubMed
    1. Brownstein CA, Brownstein JS, Williams DS, et al. The power of social networking in medicine. Nat Biotechnol 2009;27:888–90 - PubMed
    1. Eytan T, Benabio J, Golla V, et al. Social media and the health system. Perm J 2011;15:71–4 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types