Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013;10(5):e1001386.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001386. Epub 2013 May 7.

Measuring coverage in MNCH: total survey error and the interpretation of intervention coverage estimates from household surveys

Thomas P Eisele  1 , Dale A Rhoda, Felicity T Cutts, Joseph Keating, Ruilin Ren, Aluisio J D Barros, Fred Arnold
Affiliations
Review

Measuring coverage in MNCH: total survey error and the interpretation of intervention coverage estimates from household surveys

Thomas P Eisele et al. PLoS Med. 2013.

Abstract

Nationally representative household surveys are increasingly relied upon to measure maternal, newborn, and child health (MNCH) intervention coverage at the population level in low- and middle-income countries. Surveys are the best tool we have for this purpose and are central to national and global decision making. However, all survey point estimates have a certain level of error (total survey error) comprising sampling and non-sampling error, both of which must be considered when interpreting survey results for decision making. In this review, we discuss the importance of considering these errors when interpreting MNCH intervention coverage estimates derived from household surveys, using relevant examples from national surveys to provide context. Sampling error is usually thought of as the precision of a point estimate and is represented by 95% confidence intervals, which are measurable. Confidence intervals can inform judgments about whether estimated parameters are likely to be different from the real value of a parameter. We recommend, therefore, that confidence intervals for key coverage indicators should always be provided in survey reports. By contrast, the direction and magnitude of non-sampling error is almost always unmeasurable, and therefore unknown. Information error and bias are the most common sources of non-sampling error in household survey estimates and we recommend that they should always be carefully considered when interpreting MNCH intervention coverage based on survey data. Overall, we recommend that future research on measuring MNCH intervention coverage should focus on refining and improving survey-based coverage estimates to develop a better understanding of how results should be interpreted and used.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Two ways of looking at coverage of full immunization in Ethiopia—with and without confidence intervals.
Ethiopia DHS surveys 2000, 2005, 2011 .
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hancioglu A, Arnold F (2013) Measuring coverage in MNCH: Tracking progress in health for women and children using DHS and MICS household surveys. PLoS Med 10: e1001391 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001391. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Groves RM, Fowler FJ, Couper MP, Lepkowski JM, Singer E, et al... (2009) Survey methodology. Hoboken (New Jersey): John Wiley and Sons.
    1. Levy PS, Lemenshow S (1999) Sampling of populations: methods and applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons Inc.
    1. Payton ME, Greenstone MH, Schenker N (2003) Overlapping confidence intervals or standard error intervals: what do they mean in terms of statistical significance? J Insect Sci 3: 34. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Schenker N, Gentleman JF (2001) On judging the significance of differences by examioning the overlap between confidence intervals. Am Stat 55: 182–186.

MeSH terms