Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013;10(5):e1001391.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001391. Epub 2013 May 7.

Measuring coverage in MNCH: tracking progress in health for women and children using DHS and MICS household surveys

Affiliations
Review

Measuring coverage in MNCH: tracking progress in health for women and children using DHS and MICS household surveys

Attila Hancioglu et al. PLoS Med. 2013.

Abstract

Household surveys are the primary data source of coverage indicators for children and women for most developing countries. Most of this information is generated by two global household survey programmes-the USAID-supported Demographic and Health Surveys (DHS) and the UNICEF-supported Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys (MICS). In this review, we provide an overview of these two programmes, which cover a wide range of child and maternal health topics and provide estimates of many Millennium Development Goal indicators, as well as estimates of the indicators for the Countdown to 2015 initiative and the Commission on Information and Accountability for Women's and Children's Health. MICS and DHS collaborate closely and work through interagency processes to ensure that survey tools are harmonized and comparable as far as possible, but we highlight differences between DHS and MICS in the population covered and the reference periods used to measure coverage. These differences need to be considered when comparing estimates of reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health indicators across countries and over time and we discuss the implications of these differences for coverage measurement. Finally, we discuss the need for survey planners and consumers of survey results to understand the strengths, limitations, and constraints of coverage measurements generated through household surveys, and address some technical issues surrounding sampling and quality control. We conclude that, although much effort has been made to improve coverage measurement in household surveys, continuing efforts are needed, including further research to improve and refine survey methods and analytical techniques.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Number of DHS and MICS surveys by year.

References

    1. Requejo J, Bryce J, Victora C, the Countdown to 2015 Report Writing Team (2012) Building a future for women and children: the 2012 Report. Washington (D.C.): World Health Organization and UNICEF. Available: http://www.countdown2015mnch.org/documents/2012Report/2012-complete-no-p.... Accessed 8 December 2012.
    1. Commission on Information and Accountability for Women's and Children's Health (2011) Keeping promises, measuring results. Geneva: World Health Organization.
    1. Countdown to 2015, HMN, UNICEF, WHO (2011) Monitoring maternal, newborn and child health: understanding key progress indicators. Geneva: World Health Organization.
    1. Barros AJD, Victora CG (2013) Measuring coverage in MNCH: Determining and interpreting inequalities in coverage of maternal, newborn, and child health interventions. PLoS Med 10: e1001390 doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001390. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. MEASURE DHS Demographic and Health Surveys. Available: http://www.measuredhs.com/. Accessed 8 December 2012.

MeSH terms