Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar;23(3):298-313.
doi: 10.1002/hec.2938. Epub 2013 May 14.

Competition and quality in home health care markets

Kyoungrae Jung  1 , Daniel Polsky
Affiliations

Competition and quality in home health care markets

Kyoungrae Jung et al. Health Econ. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Market-based solutions are often proposed to improve health care quality; yet evidence on the role of competition in quality in non-hospital settings is sparse. We examine the relationship between competition and quality in home health care. This market is different from other markets in that service delivery takes place in patients' homes, which implies low costs of market entry and exit for agencies. We use 6 years of panel data for Medicare beneficiaries during the early 2000s. We identify the competition effect from within-market variation in competition over time. We analyze three quality measures: functional improvements, the number of home health visits, and discharges without hospitalization. We find that the relationship between competition and home health quality is nonlinear and its pattern differs by quality measure. Competition has positive effects on functional improvements and the number of visits in most ranges, but in the most competitive markets, functional outcomes and the number of visits slightly drop. Competition has a negative effect on discharges without hospitalization that is strongest in the most competitive markets. This finding is different from prior research on hospital markets and suggests that market-specific environments should be considered in developing polices to promote competition.

Keywords: competition; home health care markets; quality of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

No conflicts of interest exist.

Figures

Figure A1
Figure A1
Predicted quality scores from fixed effects models using Herfindahl Index * HHI: Predicted Herfindahl Index; Zip-level and county-level cut-off values are: HHI ≤ 10,000 and HHI ≤ 10,000 (decile 1), HHI ≤ 4,862 and HHI ≤ 4,168 (decile 2), HHI ≤ 3,720 and HHI ≤ 3,043 (decile 3), HHI ≤ 2,455 and HHI ≤ 2,364 (decile 4), HHI ≤ 1,950 and HHI ≤ 1,822 (decile 5), HHI ≤ 1,604 and HHI ≤ 1,399 (decile 6), HHI ≤ 1,302 and HHI ≤ 1,066 (decile 7), HHI ≤ 1,093 and HHI ≤ 835 (decile 8), HHI ≤ 950 and HHI ≤ 585 (decile 9), and HHI ≤ 575 and HHI ≤ 306 (decile 10).
Figure A2
Figure A2
Predicted quality scores from fixed effects models using number of agencies * Zip-level and county-level cut-off values are: N ≤ 3 and N ≤ 7 (decile 1), N ≤ 4 and N ≤ 10 (decile 2), N ≤ 5 and N ≤ 14 (decile 3), N ≤ 6 and N ≤ 18 (decile 4), N ≤ 7 and N ≤ 24 (decile 5), N ≤ 8 and N ≤ 31 (decile 6), N ≤ 11 and N ≤ 40 (decile 7), N ≤ 14 and N ≤ 56 (decile 8), N ≤ 19 and N ≤ 122 (decile 9), and N ≤ 58 and N ≤ 378 (decile 10).
Figure A3
Figure A3
Predicted quality scores for hospital-discharged and community-based patients * HHI: Predicted Herfindahl Index
Figure A4
Figure A4
Predicted quality scores from analysis of patients with congestive heart failure * HHI: Predicted Herfindahl Index
Figure 1
Figure 1
Unadjusted quality scores by competition.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Predicted quality scores from fixed effects models by competition.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Predicted quality scores by competition by Certificate of Need (CON) status.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Akerlof GA. The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1970;84(3):488–500.
    1. Bishop CE, Kerwin J, Wallack S. The Medicare home health benefit: implications of recent payment changes. Care Management Journals. 1999;1(3):1–7. - PubMed
    1. Chen Q, Kane RL, Finch M. –2001. The cost effectiveness of post-acute care for elderly Medicare beneficiaries. Inquiry. 2000;37(4):359–375. - PubMed
    1. Chou S. Asymmetric information, ownership and quality of care: an empirical analysis of nursing homes. Journal of Health Economics. 2002;21:293–311. - PubMed
    1. Gaynor M. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No 12301. 2006. What do we know about competition and quality in health care markets?

Publication types

MeSH terms