Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Apr;43(2):83-95.
doi: 10.4041/kjod.2013.43.2.83. Epub 2013 Apr 25.

Evaluation of alveolar bone loss following rapid maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography

Asli Baysal  1 , Tancan Uysal, Ilknur Veli, Torun Ozer, Irfan Karadede, Seyit Hekimoglu
Affiliations

Evaluation of alveolar bone loss following rapid maxillary expansion using cone-beam computed tomography

Asli Baysal et al. Korean J Orthod. 2013 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the changes in cortical bone thickness, alveolar bone height, and the incidence of dehiscence and fenestration in the surrounding alveolar bone of posterior teeth after rapid maxillary expansion (RME) treatment using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

Methods: The CBCT records of 20 subjects (9 boys, mean age: 13.97 ± 1.17 years; 11 girls, mean age: 13.53 ± 2.12 year) that underwent RME were selected from the archives. CBCT scans had been taken before (T1) and after (T2) the RME. Moreover, 10 of the subjects had 6-month retention (T3) records. We used the CBCT data to evaluate the buccal and palatal aspects of the canines, first and second premolars, and the first molars at 3 vertical levels. The cortical bone thickness and alveolar bone height at T1 and T2 were evaluated with the paired-samples t-test or the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Repeated measure ANOVA or the Friedman test was used to evaluate the statistical significance at T1, T2, and T3. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results: The buccal cortical bone thickness decreased gradually from baseline to the end of the retention period. After expansion, the buccal alveolar bone height was reduced significantly; however, this change was not statistically significant after the 6-month retention period. During the course of the treatment, the incidence of dehiscence and fenestration increased and decreased, respectively.

Conclusions: RME may have detrimental effects on the supporting alveolar bone, since the thickness and height of the buccal alveolar bone decreased during the retention period.

Keywords: Cone-beam computed tomography; Periodontium; Rapid maxillary expansion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Buccal cortical bone thickness (BCBT) and palatal cortical bone thickness (PCBT) at the level of the trifurcation of the first molar.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Buccal alveolar height (BAH: distance between the cusp tip and the buccal alveolar crest) of the maxillary first molar.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The presence of dehiscence at 3 consecutive views. Arrow shows the localization of dehisence.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The presence of fenestration at 3 consecutive views. Arrow shows the localization of dehisence.
Figure 5
Figure 5
An example of a decrease in the buccal cortical bone thickness of the maxillary right molar.
Figure 6
Figure 6
An example of an increase in the buccal alveolar height of the maxillary left molar.
Figure 7
Figure 7
An example of treatment changes: the palatal cortical bone thickness increased after active expansion and decreased at the end of retention.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Langford SR, Sims MR. Root surface resorption, repair, and periodontal attachment following rapid maxillary expansion in man. Am J Orthod. 1982;81:108–115. - PubMed
    1. Graber TM. Chapter 10. Dentofacial orthopedics. In: Graber TM, editor. Current orthodontic concepts and tech niques. Vol 11. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company; 1969.
    1. Odenrick L, Karlander EL, Pierce A, Kretschmar U. Surface resorption following two forms of rapid maxillary expansion. Eur J Orthod. 1991;13:264–270. - PubMed
    1. Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JY, Kim J, Taylor G. Factors affecting buccal bone changes of maxillary posterior teeth after rapid maxillary expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132:428.e1–428.e8. - PubMed
    1. Kartalian A, Gohl E, Adamian M, Enciso R. Cone-beam computerized tomography evaluation of the maxillary dentoskeletal complex after rapid palatal expansion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010;138:486–492. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources