Combined treatment with headgear and the Frog appliance for maxillary molar distalization: a randomized controlled trial
- PMID: 23671835
- PMCID: PMC3650212
- DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2013.43.2.101
Combined treatment with headgear and the Frog appliance for maxillary molar distalization: a randomized controlled trial
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the efficiency of the Frog appliance (FA) alone or in combination with headgear for distalizing the maxillary molars.
Methods: Fifty patients (25 males and 25 females) aged 12.6 - 16.7 years who received treatment for Class II malocclusion at the Orthodontic Clinic of Al-Baath University were selected for this study and randomly divided into 2 equal groups. Maxillary molar distalization was achieved using the FA alone (group 1) or a combination of the FA with high-pull headgear worn at night (group 2). Lateral cephalograms were obtained before and after treatment.
Results: The maxillary molars moved distally by 5.51 and 5.93 mm in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Distal movements were associated with axial tipping by 4.96° and 1.25°, and with loss of anchorage by mesial movement of the second maxillary premolars by 2.70 and 0.90 mm in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The combined use of the FA and nighttime high-pull headgear decreased the distalization time and improved the ratio of maxillary molar distalization movement relative to the overall opening space between the first maxillary molars and second premolars.
Conclusions: The FA can effectively distalize the maxillary molars, this distalization associates with some unfavorable changes. Nighttime use of high-pull headgear combined with the FA can reduce these unfavorable changes and improve treatment outcomes.
Keywords: Headgear; Malocclusion; Molar distalization; Orthodontic appliances.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no commercial, proprietary, or financial interest in the products or companies described in this article.
Figures
References
-
- Bolla E, Muratore F, Carano A, Bowman SJ. Evaluation of maxillary molar distalization with the distal jet: a comparison with other contemporary methods. Angle Orthod. 2002;72:481–494. - PubMed
-
- Bondemark L, Karlsson I. Extraoral vs intraoral appliance for distal movement of maxillary first molars: a randomized controlled trial. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:699–706. - PubMed
-
- Haydar S, Uner O. Comparison of Jones jig molar distalization appliance with extraoral traction. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;117:49–53. - PubMed
-
- Angelieri F, de Almeida RR, Janson G, Castanha Henriques JF, Pinzan A. Comparison of the effects produced by headgear and pendulum appliances followed by fixed orthodontic treatment. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30:572–579. - PubMed
-
- El-Mangoury NH. Orthodontic cooperation. Am J Orthod. 1981;80:604–622. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources