Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar-Apr;35(2):7-13.

Exploring the ethics and psychological impact of deception in psychological research

Affiliations

Exploring the ethics and psychological impact of deception in psychological research

Marcella H Boynton et al. IRB. 2013 Mar-Apr.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Milgram S. Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1963;67(4):371–378. - PubMed
    2. Humphreys L. Tearoom trade. Society. 1970;7(3):10–25.
    1. Kelman HC. Human use of human subjects: The problem of deception in social psychological experiments. Psychological Bulletin. 1967;67(1):1–11. - PubMed
    2. Hertwig R, Ortmann A. Deception in experiments: Revisiting the arguments in its defense. Ethics and Behavior. 2008;18(1):59–92.
    3. Broder A. Deception can be acceptable. American Psychologist. 1998;53(7):805–806.
    4. Ortmann A, Hertwig R. Is deception acceptable? American Psychologist. 1997;52(7):746–747.
    1. American Psychological Association Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. 2002 http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx.
    1. Kimmel AJ. Ethical Issues on Behavioral Research: Basic and Applied Perspectives. 2nd ed Blackwell Publishing; Oxford, U.K.: 2007.
    2. Cook KS, Yamagishi T. A defense of deception on scientific grounds. Social Psychology Quarterly. 2008;71(3):215–221.
    1. Riach PA, Rich J. Deceptive field experiments of discrimination: Are they ethical? Kyklos. 2004;57(3):457–470.
    2. Oakes JM. Risks and wrongs in social science research: An evaluator’s guide to the IRB. Evaluation Review. 2002;26(5):443–479. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources