Exploring the ethics and psychological impact of deception in psychological research
- PMID: 23672145
- PMCID: PMC4502434
Exploring the ethics and psychological impact of deception in psychological research
References
-
- Milgram S. Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology. 1963;67(4):371–378. - PubMed
- Humphreys L. Tearoom trade. Society. 1970;7(3):10–25.
-
- Kelman HC. Human use of human subjects: The problem of deception in social psychological experiments. Psychological Bulletin. 1967;67(1):1–11. - PubMed
- Hertwig R, Ortmann A. Deception in experiments: Revisiting the arguments in its defense. Ethics and Behavior. 2008;18(1):59–92.
- Broder A. Deception can be acceptable. American Psychologist. 1998;53(7):805–806.
- Ortmann A, Hertwig R. Is deception acceptable? American Psychologist. 1997;52(7):746–747.
-
- American Psychological Association Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. 2002 http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx.
-
- Kimmel AJ. Ethical Issues on Behavioral Research: Basic and Applied Perspectives. 2nd ed Blackwell Publishing; Oxford, U.K.: 2007.
- Cook KS, Yamagishi T. A defense of deception on scientific grounds. Social Psychology Quarterly. 2008;71(3):215–221.
-
- Riach PA, Rich J. Deceptive field experiments of discrimination: Are they ethical? Kyklos. 2004;57(3):457–470.
- Oakes JM. Risks and wrongs in social science research: An evaluator’s guide to the IRB. Evaluation Review. 2002;26(5):443–479. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical