Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May 14:11:126.
doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-11-126.

Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC

Affiliations

Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC

Bruce N Cuthbert et al. BMC Med. .

Abstract

Background: Current diagnostic systems for mental disorders rely upon presenting signs and symptoms, with the result that current definitions do not adequately reflect relevant neurobiological and behavioral systems--impeding not only research on etiology and pathophysiology but also the development of new treatments.

Discussion: The National Institute of Mental Health began the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project in 2009 to develop a research classification system for mental disorders based upon dimensions of neurobiology and observable behavior. RDoC supports research to explicate fundamental biobehavioral dimensions that cut across current heterogeneous disorder categories. We summarize the rationale, status and long-term goals of RDoC, outline challenges in developing a research classification system (such as construct validity and a suitable process for updating the framework) and discuss seven distinct differences in conception and emphasis from current psychiatric nosologies.

Summary: Future diagnostic systems cannot reflect ongoing advances in genetics, neuroscience and cognitive science until a literature organized around these disciplines is available to inform the revision efforts. The goal of the RDoC project is to provide a framework for research to transform the approach to the nosology of mental disorders.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Wing L, Gould J, Gillberg C. Autism spectrum disorders in the DSM-V: better or worse than the DSM-IV? Res Dev Disabil. 2011;32:768–773. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.11.003. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Friedman RA. Grief, depression, and the DSM-5. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1855–1857. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1201794. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Skodol AE. Personality disorders in DSM-5. Annual Rev of Clinical Psychology. 2012;8:317–344. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143131. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Clarkin JF, Huprich SK. Do DSM-5 personality disorder proposals meet criteria for clinical utility? J Pers Disorders. 2011;25:192–205. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2011.25.2.192. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Phillips J, Frances A, Cerullo MA, Chardavoyne J, Decker HS, First MB, Ghaemi N, Greenberg G, Hinderliter AC, Kinghorn WA, LoBello SG, Martin EB, Mishara AL, Paris J, Pierre JM, Pies RW, Pincus HA, Porter D, Pouncey C, Schwartz MA, Szasz T, Wakefield JC, Waterman GS, Whooley O, Zachar P. The six most essential questions in psychiatric diagnosis: a pluralogue part 1: conceptual and definitional issues in psychiatric diagnosis. Philos Ethics Humanit Med. 2012;7:3. doi: 10.1186/1747-5341-7-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed