Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Oct;30(7):867-76.
doi: 10.1007/s10585-013-9587-4. Epub 2013 May 15.

Low BRAF and NRAS expression levels are associated with clinical benefit from DTIC therapy and prognosis in metastatic melanoma

Affiliations

Low BRAF and NRAS expression levels are associated with clinical benefit from DTIC therapy and prognosis in metastatic melanoma

Einar Birkeland et al. Clin Exp Metastasis. 2013 Oct.

Abstract

Metastatic melanoma is characterized by a poor response to chemotherapy. Furthermore, there is a lack of established predictive and prognostic markers. In this single institution study, we correlated mutation status and expression levels of BRAF and NRAS to dacarbazine (DTIC) treatment response as well as progression-free and overall survival in a cohort of 85 patients diagnosed with advanced melanoma. Neither BRAF nor NRAS mutation status correlated to treatment response. However, patients with tumors harboring NRAS mutations had a shorter overall survival (p < 0.001) compared to patients with tumors wild-type for NRAS. Patients having a clinical benefit (objective response or stable disease at 3 months) on DTIC therapy had lower BRAF and NRAS expression levels compared to patients progressing on therapy (p = 0.037 and 0.003, respectively). For BRAF expression, this association was stronger among patients with tumors wild-type for BRAF (p = 0.005). Further, low BRAF as well as NRAS expression levels were associated with a longer progression-free survival in the total population (p = 0.004 and <0.001, respectively). Contrasting low NRAS expression levels, which were associated with improved overall survival in the total population (p = 0.01), low BRAF levels were associated with improved overall survival only among patients with tumors wild-type for BRAF (p = 0.013). These findings indicate that BRAF and NRAS expression levels may influence responses to DTIC as well as prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Expression characteristics of BRAF mRNA. Expression levels of BRAF mRNA in: a benign melanocytic nevi and in metastatic melanoma biopsies, b tumors with wild-type or mutated BRAF, and c tumors with or without BRAF copy-number gains. Asterisks denote significance levels: *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.005, ***p ≤ 0.001
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
BRAF mRNA expression and response to DTIC treatment. BRAF mRNA expression among patients experiencing a clinical benefit or progressive disease (PD) 3 months after commencement of DTIC chemotherapy. a BRAF expression in the total patient group, b data as presented in a, but limited to patients with tumors harboring wild-type BRAF, c similar analysis performed for tumors harboring BRAF V600 mutations. Asterisks denote significance levels: *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.005
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
NRAS mRNA expression. a Expression levels of NRAS mRNA in benign melanocytic nevi (n = 8) and metastatic melanoma (n = 82). b Correlation plot showing the expression of NRAS in each tumor in relation to BRAF expression. c Expression levels of NRAS mRNA in patients experiencing a clinical benefit or progressive disease (PD) 3 months after commencement of chemotherapy. Asterisks denote significance levels: *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.005
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Progression-free and overall survival with respect to BRAF/NRAS status. Kaplan–Meier curves showing overall and progression-free survival: a, b patients with tumors harboring BRAF mutations or NRAS mutations, c, d effect of BRAF expression levels above or below the median value among patients evaluable for treatment response (median value determined among all patients). Solid curves represent all patients; dashed curves represent only patients with tumors harboring wild-type BRAF; e, f effect of NRAS expression levels above or below the median value among patients evaluable for treatment response (median value determined among all patients), g, h effect of combined BRAF/NRAS expression levels: one or both above compared to both below the median values. *All three groups included in the analysis

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rigel DS. Cutaneous ultraviolet exposure and its relationship to the development of skin cancer. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;58(5 Suppl 2):S129–S132. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.04.034. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Francken AB, Accortt NA, Shaw HM, et al. Follow-up schedules after treatment for malignant melanoma. Br J Surg. 2008;95(11):1401–1407. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6347. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eggermont AM. Reaching first base in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(29):4673–4674. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.3593. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Akslen LA, Angelini S, Straume O, et al. BRAF and NRAS mutations are frequent in nodular melanoma but are not associated with tumor cell proliferation or patient survival. J Investig Dermatol. 2005;125(2):312–317. - PubMed
    1. Ugurel S, Thirumaran RK, Bloethner S, et al. B-RAF and N-RAS mutations are preserved during short time in vitro propagation and differentially impact prognosis. PLoS ONE. 2007;2(2):e236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000236. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types