Applicability of randomized trials in radiation oncology to standard clinical practice
- PMID: 23674290
- DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28149
Applicability of randomized trials in radiation oncology to standard clinical practice
Abstract
Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are commonly used to inform clinical practice; however, it is unclear how generalizable RCT data are to patients in routine clinical practice. The authors of this report assessed the availability and applicability of randomized evidence guiding medical decisions in a cohort of patients who were evaluated for consideration of definitive management in a radiation oncology clinic.
Methods: The medical records of consecutive, new patient consultations between January and March 2007 were reviewed. Patient medical decisions were classified as those with (Group 1) or without (Group 2) available, relevant level I evidence (phase 3 RCT) supporting recommended treatments. Group 1 medical decisions were further divided into 3 groups based on the extent of fulfilling eligibility criteria for each RCT: Group 1A included decisions that fulfilled all eligibility criteria; Group 1B, decisions that did not fulfill at least 1 minor eligibility criteria; or Group 1C, decisions that did not fulfill at least 1 major eligibility criteria. Patient and clinical characteristics were tested for correlations with the availability of evidence.
Results: Of the 393 evaluable patients, malignancies of the breast (30%), head and neck (18%), and genitourinary system (14%) were the most common presenting primary disease sites. Forty-seven percent of all medical decisions (n = 451) were made without available (36%) or applicable (11%) randomized evidence to inform clinical decision making. Primary tumor diagnosis was significantly associated with the availability of evidence (P < .0001).
Conclusions: A significant proportion of medical decisions in an academic radiation oncology clinic were made without available or applicable level I evidence, underscoring the limitations of relying solely on RCTs for the development of evidence-based health care.
Keywords: comparative effective research; evidence-based medicine; health care policy; radiation oncology; randomized controlled trials.
Copyright © 2013 American Cancer Society.
Similar articles
-
National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference statement: adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, November 1-3, 2000.J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001;(30):5-15. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2001. PMID: 11773285 Review.
-
Prostate cancer, comorbidity, and participation in randomized controlled trials of therapy.J Investig Med. 2010 Mar;58(3):566-8. doi: 10.231/JIM.0b013e3181cf9002. J Investig Med. 2010. PMID: 20072029
-
Use of strontium-89 in endocrine-refractory prostate cancer metastatic to bone. Provincial Genitourinary Cancer Disease Site Group.Cancer Prev Control. 1998 Apr;2(2):79-87. Cancer Prev Control. 1998. PMID: 9765768
-
Using routine data to complement and enhance the results of randomised controlled trials.Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(22):1-55. Health Technol Assess. 2000. PMID: 11074392
-
Adjuvant therapy for breast cancer.NIH Consens Statement. 2000 Nov 1-3;17(4):1-35. NIH Consens Statement. 2000. PMID: 11512506 Review.
Cited by
-
Role of Real-World Data in Assessing Cardiac Toxicity After Lung Cancer Radiotherapy.Front Oncol. 2022 Jul 19;12:934369. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.934369. eCollection 2022. Front Oncol. 2022. PMID: 35928875 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Extent of Exclusions for Chronic Conditions in Breast Cancer Trials.JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018 Dec 11;2(4):pky059. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pky059. eCollection 2018 Oct. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2018. PMID: 31825011 Free PMC article.
-
Applied Swarm-based medicine: collecting decision trees for patterns of algorithms analysis.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Aug 16;17(1):123. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0400-y. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017. PMID: 28814269 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources