Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 May 10;8(5):e62820.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062820. Print 2013.

The impact of genetic susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus on placental malaria in mice

Affiliations

The impact of genetic susceptibility to systemic lupus erythematosus on placental malaria in mice

Michael Waisberg et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Severe malaria, including cerebral malaria (CM) and placental malaria (PM), have been recognized to have many of the features of uncontrolled inflammation. We recently showed that in mice genetic susceptibility to the lethal inflammatory autoimmune disease, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), conferred resistance to CM. Protection appeared to be mediated by immune mechanisms that allowed SLE-prone mice, prior to the onset of overt SLE symptoms, to better control their inflammatory response to Plasmodium infection. Here we extend these findings to ask does SLE susceptibility have 1) a cost to reproductive fitness and/or 2) an effect on PM in mice? The rates of conception for WT and SLE susceptible (SLE(s)) mice were similar as were the number and viability of fetuses in pregnant WT and SLE(s) mice indicating that SLE susceptibility does not have a reproductive cost. We found that Plasmodium chabaudi AS (Pc) infection disrupted early stages of pregnancy before the placenta was completely formed resulting in massive decidual necrosis 8 days after conception. Pc-infected pregnant SLE(s) mice had significantly more fetuses (∼1.8 fold) but SLE did not significantly affect fetal viability in infected animals. This was despite the fact that Pc-infected pregnant SLE(s) mice had more severe symptoms of malaria as compared to Pc-infected pregnant WT mice. Thus, although SLE susceptibility was not protective in PM in mice it also did not have a negative impact on reproductive fitness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Effects of SLE susceptibility and malaria on parasitemia, hemoglobin and body weight.
(A–B) Peripheral parasitemia were determined at days 6, 7 and 8 post-conception. (C–D) Blood hemoglobin concentrations were determined at day 6, 7 and 8 post-inoculation. Data are stratified according to pregnancy and infection status. (E–F) Body weight was determined at days 6, 7 and 8 post-conception. Data was stratified according to pregnancy and infection status. n = 15 (WT) and n = 18 (SLEs) for parasitemia; n = 30 (WT) and 34 (SLE) for hemoglobin and body weight.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effects of SLE susceptibility and malaria on reproductive fitness.
(A) Conception rates (i.e. percentage of plugged animals that were determined to be pregnant) were determined at day 8 post-copula. (B) The total number of fetuses was determined at day 8 post-conception. (C) Graph shows the percentage of non-necrotic fetuses determined by analyzing H&E sections of uteri collected at day 8 post-conception. Samples marked as ‘All’ represented the pooled data for SLEs or all WT, independent of infection status. WT (n = 36) and SLEs mice (N = 36).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Malaria caused massive decidual necrosis in SLEs and control animals.
Uterine section of an infected SLE mouse (A) or infected WT mouse (D) showing massive decidual necrosis at day 8 post-conception at low-magnification (1.25×). High-magnification views (4× and 10×) of uteri from an infected SLE (B–C) and infected WT mouse (E–F). Uterine section of an uninfected SLE (G) or uninfected WT mouse (J) showing normal morphology of an 8 day old fetus at low-magnification (1.25×). High-magnification views (4× and 10×) of uteri from a non-infected SLE (H–I) or uninfected WT mouse (K–L). Uteri from all mice were analyzed by a pathologist (n = 72).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Guyatt HL, Snow RW (2004) Impact of malaria during pregnancy on low birth weight in sub-Saharan Africa. Clin Microbiol Rev 17: 760–769, table of contents. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Umbers AJ, Aitken EH, Rogerson SJ (2011) Malaria in pregnancy: small babies, big problem. Trends Parasitol 27: 168–175. - PubMed
    1. Brabin BJ, Romagosa C, Abdelgalil S, Menendez C, Verhoeff FH, et al. (2004) The sick placenta-the role of malaria. Placenta 25: 359–378. - PubMed
    1. Molokhia M, McKeigue P (2006) Systemic lupus erythematosus: genes versus environment in high risk populations. Lupus 15: 827–832. - PubMed
    1. Bae SC, Fraser P, Liang MH (1998) The epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus in populations of African ancestry: a critical review of the “prevalence gradient hypothesis”. Arthritis Rheum 41: 2091–2099. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms