Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2013 May 10;8(5):e62836.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062836. Print 2013.

Efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training for people with hearing loss: a systematic review of the evidence

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training for people with hearing loss: a systematic review of the evidence

Helen Henshaw et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Auditory training involves active listening to auditory stimuli and aims to improve performance in auditory tasks. As such, auditory training is a potential intervention for the management of people with hearing loss.

Objective: This systematic review (PROSPERO 2011: CRD42011001406) evaluated the published evidence-base for the efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training to improve speech intelligibility, cognition and communication abilities in adults with hearing loss, with or without hearing aids or cochlear implants.

Methods: A systematic search of eight databases and key journals identified 229 articles published since 1996, 13 of which met the inclusion criteria. Data were independently extracted and reviewed by the two authors. Study quality was assessed using ten pre-defined scientific and intervention-specific measures.

Results: Auditory training resulted in improved performance for trained tasks in 9/10 articles that reported on-task outcomes. Although significant generalisation of learning was shown to untrained measures of speech intelligibility (11/13 articles), cognition (1/1 articles) and self-reported hearing abilities (1/2 articles), improvements were small and not robust. Where reported, compliance with computer-based auditory training was high, and retention of learning was shown at post-training follow-ups. Published evidence was of very-low to moderate study quality.

Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that published evidence for the efficacy of individual computer-based auditory training for adults with hearing loss is not robust and therefore cannot be reliably used to guide intervention at this time. We identify a need for high-quality evidence to further examine the efficacy of computer-based auditory training for people with hearing loss.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flow diagram of the study identification, eligibility, and inclusion process.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. World Health Organization (2004) The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Switzerland: WHO press.
    1. Davis A, Smith P, Ferguson M, Stephens D, Gianopoulos I (2007) Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models. Health Technology Assessment 11. - PubMed
    1. Scarinci N, Worrall L, Hickson L (2008) The effect of hearing impairment in older people on the spouse. International Journal of Audiology 47: 141–151. - PubMed
    1. Hétu R, Jones L, Getty L (1993) The impact of acquired hearing impairment on intimate relationships: Implications for rehabilitation. Audiology 32: 363–381. - PubMed
    1. Banh J, Singh G, Pichora-Fuller MK (2012) Age affects responses on the speech, spatial and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ) by adults with minimal audometric loss. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 23: 81–91. - PubMed