Use of evidence-based practice among athletic training educators, clinicians, and students, part 2: attitudes, beliefs, accessibility, and barriers
- PMID: 23675800
- PMCID: PMC3655754
- DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.2.19
Use of evidence-based practice among athletic training educators, clinicians, and students, part 2: attitudes, beliefs, accessibility, and barriers
Abstract
Context: Successful implementation of evidence-based practice (EBP) within athletic training is contingent upon understanding the attitudes and beliefs and perceived barriers toward EBP as well as the accessibility to EBP resources of athletic training educators, clinicians, and students.
Objective: To assess the attitudes, beliefs, and perceived barriers toward EBP and accessibility to EBP resources among athletic training educators, clinicians, and students.
Design: Cross-sectional study.
Setting: Online survey instrument.
Patients or other participants: A total of 1209 athletic trainers participated: professional athletic training education program directors (n = 132), clinical preceptors (n = 266), clinicians (n = 716), postprofessional athletic training educators (n = 24) and postprofessional students (n = 71).
Main outcome measure(s): Likert-scale items (1 = strongly disagree, 4 = strongly agree) assessed attitudes and beliefs and perceived barriers, whereas multipart questions assessed accessibility to resources. Kruskal-Wallis H tests (P ≤ .05) and Mann-Whitney U tests with a Bonferroni adjustment (P ≤ .01) were used to determine differences among groups.
Results: Athletic trainers agreed (3.27 ± 0.39 out of 4.0) that EBP has various benefits to clinical practice and disagreed (2.23 ± 0.42 out of 4.0) that negative perceptions are associated with EBP. Benefits to practice scores (P = .002) and negative perception scores (P < .001) differed among groups. With respect to perceived barriers, athletic trainers disagreed that personal skills and attributes (2.29 ± 0.52 out of 4.0) as well as support and accessibility to resources (2.40 ± 0.40 out of 4.0) were barriers to EBP implementation. Differences were found among groups for personal skills and attributes scores (P < .001) and support and accessibility to resources scores (P < .001). Time (76.6%) and availability of EBP mentors (69.6%) were the 2 most prevalent barriers reported. Of the resources assessed, participants were most unfamiliar with clinical prediction rules (37.6%) and Cochrane databases (52.5%); direct access to these 2 resources varied among participants.
Conclusions: Athletic trainers had positive attitudes toward the implementation of EBP within didactic education and clinical practice. However, accessibility and resource use remained low for some EBP-related resources. Although the perceived barriers to implementation are minimal, effective integration of EBP within athletic training will present challenges until these barriers dissolve.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Use of evidence-based practice among athletic training educators, clinicians, and students, part 1: perceived importance, knowledge, and confidence.J Athl Train. 2013 May-Jun;48(3):394-404. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.2.16. Epub 2013 Feb 20. J Athl Train. 2013. PMID: 23675799 Free PMC article.
-
Athletic Trainers' Beliefs About and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice.J Athl Train. 2016 Jan;51(1):35-46. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.2.11. Epub 2016 Feb 4. J Athl Train. 2016. PMID: 26845629 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions of approved clinical instructors: barriers in the implementation of evidence-based practice.J Athl Train. 2013 May-Jun;48(3):382-93. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.1.18. Epub 2013 Feb 20. J Athl Train. 2013. PMID: 23675798 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence-based practice: Knowledge, attitudes, implementation, facilitators, and barriers among community nurses-systematic review.Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(39):e17209. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017209. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019. PMID: 31574830 Free PMC article.
-
Evidence-Based Practice Competencies among Nutrition Professionals and Students: A Systematic Review.J Nutr. 2024 Apr;154(4):1414-1427. doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.12.044. Epub 2023 Dec 29. J Nutr. 2024. PMID: 38159813 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Influences of Athletic Trainers' Return-to-Activity Assessments for Patients With an Ankle Sprain.J Athl Train. 2024 Feb 1;59(2):201-211. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0628.22. J Athl Train. 2024. PMID: 36972196 Free PMC article.
-
Use of evidence-based practice among athletic training educators, clinicians, and students, part 1: perceived importance, knowledge, and confidence.J Athl Train. 2013 May-Jun;48(3):394-404. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-48.2.16. Epub 2013 Feb 20. J Athl Train. 2013. PMID: 23675799 Free PMC article.
-
Core Competency-Related Professional Behaviors During Patient Encounters: A Report From the Association for Athletic Training Education Research Network.J Athl Train. 2022 Jan 1;57(1):99-106. doi: 10.4085/542-20. J Athl Train. 2022. PMID: 33432331 Free PMC article.
-
Relationship Between Athletic Trainer Access, Socioeconomic Status, and Race and Ethnicity in United States Secondary Schools.J Athl Train. 2025 Jan 1;60(1):82-87. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0135.24. J Athl Train. 2025. PMID: 39136089
-
Future directions of evidence-based practice in athletic training: perceived strategies to enhance the use of evidence-based practice.J Athl Train. 2014 Mar-Apr;49(2):234-44. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-49.2.15. Epub 2014 Feb 25. J Athl Train. 2014. PMID: 24568230 Free PMC article.
References
-
- National Athletic Trainers' Association. Athletic Training Education Competencies. 5th ed. Dallas, TX: NATA; 2011. pp. 1–32.
-
- Welch CE, Van Lunen BL, Walker SE, et al. Athletic training educators' knowledge, comfort, and perceived importance of evidence-based practice. Athl Train Educ J. 2011;6(1):5–14.
-
- Snyder AR. Valovich McLeod TC, Sauers E. Defining, valuing, and teaching clinical outcomes assessment in professional and post-professional athletic training education programs. Athl Train Educ J. 2007;2(2):31–41.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical